Re: Specific Questions about Registration details for IETF 108

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 05 June 2020 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8CD3A0D41 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oMIpCkoKQu04 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x533.google.com (mail-pg1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02CE73A0D3E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 185so5700347pgb.10 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CuJkP3N8q4kVvZOLDtIa/nRTp2bJR/yx6Jr1CCtDZds=; b=RHsrJWYa88Rq+jwQIakzLlnrEp3tUedluumP3mP6Df8bSROAiuSuATn6uFUXC3ZOf+ AtGaUDpbpkH/EYCl0dhU4i9n6J4tUVyxlLwzStdy91+/CKN0hS4eR3LWkivxNirweh6R uK8hbJzQYcAn+fLD49E43v1JrlkI5ym0nvNrj4FC3WkcAbI2z5gKgIgCF5YqW3QKldZU cZVlDqDeTL5VjDc33Dckjf6mycs/iBJmXXRrpA0KIJfmmzzT2iyQpHfK+vFtdwjEgKVB jLB4/7jP4Qu9nuZqp2rR//j84Zz55QSa0jD/C6pthgHoE9TX4XsWEG6U07vTd4Seirbz wOdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CuJkP3N8q4kVvZOLDtIa/nRTp2bJR/yx6Jr1CCtDZds=; b=QpKdf3Ey2hG4cmez22jdyxP8/Gutmw2jIBCto+KVLPBNwlqsuL6B1uFZwENCJmVHKN BEQUMkPk2LXgSuXioWwT2TkXF87V0MX0HjZgaZUkn9pQ+IMZ28cRi+LQ+oA5UtTUeOF2 lBBPiKOuztRAQtZeCr6bbS3yAVBdE6ilh+pJNQOX990KDsIfJQeX+N5Aq3Js+vSs4WB6 utXNK0mMRI86i6Tt6aI5ICO/FqECum0Mbj3nGR0NBt1NFpZs+SaMpPYbYWLSQLWhQ1MO 05Ut7hUpsfjuQRP504M0DCteBi3mWKmurwvGGC5rp3dCl3fZYCJsTRZ62JQzkq1u0k65 K5GA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530o7L6trj7lGQc/guTABGhiN0kf1fPrx7LTusvTgo73KTywWCuS HUNy0mqW+2KANBsedQfE3AWZvgNcB4Q=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy14K4JGvLASvrPIRkFWCXQGP9VUDQlbpq2JtcNwt4/R4qHARX2jXbAV5CLRiPyxtpsE+5yTQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:8c15:: with SMTP id m21mr10965006pfd.182.1591389653043; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.12.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c1sm421350pfo.197.2020.06.05.13.40.51 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Specific Questions about Registration details for IETF 108
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <159062833754.6110.5826748635235943562@ietfa.amsl.com> <3B19A920-9D33-4E3D-8B8B-8134A5E55316@gmail.com> <86D7C39D-9778-4408-B7CA-CB74E9572B1B@ietf.org> <511A3EE0-976B-40FF-813A-58CC115E760A@gmail.com> <20200605153042.nospgcd7nku4luag@crankycanuck.ca>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <914e8c44-c4d8-3a86-bc1a-b7c64f28dbbe@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 08:40:49 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200605153042.nospgcd7nku4luag@crankycanuck.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Taygy5qEfyDUANY2egJDObTas6Y>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 20:40:55 -0000

Andrew,

...
> (More generally, and not in reference to Bob's message in particular, I'm a little surprised at the degree to which the community wants to manage the LLC on this topic, given the oft-expressed concern during the IASA reform work that the community tended to try to involve itself in details that were really properly a staff question.)

I agree that we (the IETF as whole) must not take over the IAOC's micromanagement role. But what we've really been exploring here is mainly a matter of principle: paying for remote attendance. Obviously, the details are the LLC's province, but I think the matter of principle is a valid community concern.

    Brian