Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps)
shogunx <shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx> Wed, 15 September 2004 13:24 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA02238; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:24:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C7Zr2-0003M8-00; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:29:51 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C7Zae-0007Yf-S1; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:12:52 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C7ZS6-0006Id-0s for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:04:02 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA00643 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:03:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from user-0c6s11n.cable.mindspring.com ([24.110.4.55] helo=sleekfreak.ath.cx) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C7ZWx-0002wY-E3 for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:09:19 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by sleekfreak.ath.cx with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1C7Uk3-0002l8-00; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 04:02:15 -0400
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 04:01:17 -0400
From: shogunx <shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
In-Reply-To: <012c01c49b03$ef7f21b0$0400a8c0@DFNJGL21>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409150401060.10605-100000@sleekfreak.ath.cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: e1e48a527f609d1be2bc8d8a70eb76cb
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 4adaf050708fb13be3316a9eee889caa
How about one in Daytona Beach? On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > We kind of went away from the first half of Harald/Scott's notes, > which was > > From: "scott bradner" <sob@harvard.edu> > > > > > Harald asks > >> I feel some urgency to make sure that we have meeting arrangements > >> in place > >> for 2005 - without imperiling our ability to make the best > >> long-term > >> choices for the IETF. > > > > the logical path seems to be to ask Foretec to start making > > arrangements > > for next year's meetings - doing so in a way that could be > > transfered > > to another meeting manager if things came to that would be ideal but > > may be hard > > Or, to ask the same question another way, how long can we wait to have > SOMEone making arrangements for a meeting in March 2005? > > Spencer > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > sleekfreak pirate broadcast http://sleekfreak.ath.cx:81/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- first steps (was The other parts of the report...) scott bradner
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… scott bradner
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Margaret Wasserman
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… John C Klensin
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Steve Crocker
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Carl Malamud
- What we need done (Re: first steps (was The other… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… John C Klensin
- Re: What we need done (Re: first steps (was The o… avri
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Dave Crocker
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Dave Crocker
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… graham.travers
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… graham.travers
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Steve Crocker
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Joel Jaeggli
- IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Spencer Dawkins
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) shogunx
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Tim Chown
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) william(at)elan.net
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Hadmut Danisch
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Dick St.Peters
- Re: IETF 62 Lars Eggert
- Re: IETF 62 Sam Hartman
- Re: IETF 62 Lars Eggert
- Re: IETF 62 John C Klensin
- Re: IETF 62 Lars Eggert
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Mark Allman
- RE: Meeting locations (was IETF 62) Robin Uyeshiro
- Re: IETF 62 Scott Michel
- Re: IETF 62 Michael D Frisch
- Re: IETF 62 Ted Faber