TLS-authz draft

Simone Fittabile <simone.fittabile@poste.it> Sun, 08 February 2009 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <gmeildeno@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D955A3A693A for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:35:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.185, BAYES_20=-0.74, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aHcIWMUBk6hB for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:35:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f161.google.com (mail-bw0-f161.google.com [209.85.218.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A1D3A6806 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:35:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so726494bwz.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:35:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lb0fJMlqV3sNXxMBcyuM82MlamSQLGzaz4fLUcUb8lY=; b=NRU+6zPq7y7eH8xO20ujZQxqBzbUAzxVQq17kif9PcQM/0Qm4NmFLbpZVhrIH2GBZN D8MsD0hRlZThreEK4xiyM7HDbpMcAY6Tzu/2b4Vve+jYxkI9ayC2dKXNnAe0Nw8h3aij 6LVjs6Dm3Odecpmv3aq+Yn8wovHQtpda5OXqo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=B7pLNYWjiL/IsNB2BdNi4si9+RR8ZrKwsuSlDy/OM9xtHUmVFL0FT7uVnL99UWZBqm q1JY4T37/OdOMwQDZKc9UBV1v3lAO0BxbIsTh8WwPm9C+FINuU9sRP+D3jBtkTlBiLc0 yZiTBgquO6vSCSN+aIgyTF1Ue+zqLFWEQfDbI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: gmeildeno@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.108.71 with SMTP id e7mr616111fap.33.1234128936964; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:35:36 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2c614956c777f4cd
Message-ID: <9d1d97950902081335i290b8e71pe98e78c5f99b7aeb@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: TLS-authz draft
From: Simone Fittabile <simone.fittabile@poste.it>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001636c5a4e8e510da04626f08fe"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:51:28 -0800
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:36:20 -0000

To whom it may concern,

@IETF

Please reconsider the path of adoption for standardization, involving the
proposed technology, TLS-authorizations, as-is, drafted by 'RedPhone
security' (since 2006).

The group that proposed the standard cannot be let free to have such weight
for the matters of public standards, which hopefully will remain open
transparent  scalable and FREE as much as we all could desire. In this
perspective the 'License agreement' coming from RedPhone Security narrows
the basic freedoms of software engineering, as stated into most open-source
licenses (eg GPL, Apache). It will be a matter of approving or not a
technology (patented) that would stand next to and at the same time dominate
the open/free layers - our software communities - so this is a primary
concern: the drafted 'License' would put such a prohibiting restriction to
open models. We, the people inspired by the FSF's principles and  vision
hope this will be FIXED in time.

Thank you for your concern.

S.F.