Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> Tue, 04 April 2017 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <rsk@gsp.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D0C129510 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ci4w3FlnpRZt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taos.firemountain.net (taos.firemountain.net [207.114.3.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5299A1294F5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gsp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by taos.firemountain.net (8.15.1/8.14.9) with SMTP id v34LFQKA012906 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 17:15:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 17:15:26 -0400
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
Message-ID: <20170404211526.GA25253@gsp.org>
References: <149096990336.4276.3480662759931758139.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9fee9874-1306-07a2-a84a-4e09381a5336@cisco.com> <E67FDB14-9895-48E0-A334-167172D322DB@nohats.ca> <20170403152624.GA11714@gsp.org> <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com> <E068F01A-B720-4E7A-A60F-AA5BDA22D535@consulintel.es> <20170404181505.GA4004@localhost> <CAAQiQRcvu-BfBA_NEqZwXsHEn6ujpa2=w7P5Vu2f6GLXjKqkcA@mail.gmail.com> <20170404202446.GB4004@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170404202446.GB4004@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/TqQlt4S64gqXhCK3HIVYSaVTLNg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 21:15:30 -0000

On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 03:24:47PM -0500, Nico Williams wrote:
> Stats would be nice, but I suspect there are no reliable
> stats available [...]

There aren't, because FOIA requests attempting to learn them have not
been answered.  And that's why there's now a lawsuit filed by the
Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University against the
US DHS and ICE:

	https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3525562-Complaint-03-27-2017.html

However, any number of organizations, e.g., the EFF, the ACLU, etc.,
have independently noted the recent sharp uptick.  In addition, the Wall
Street Journal is reporting today that a new set of procedures under
consideration will include demanding the phone passwords from *all*
foreigners entering the US.

---rsk