IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 08 August 2012 04:05 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED8221F85F0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 21:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -111.158
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.158 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bmzr1M1F19HY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 21:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B402E21F85EF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 21:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 67151 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2012 04:05:09 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 8 Aug 2012 04:05:09 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=5021e575.xn--9vv.k1208; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=Rjdlb/wzt2oMFc3LUim9KNJSNPrmkHieTRpeCm+t8XI=; b=hr6B05ZFzlv/TwX/cVigjnwXweFmyZIa/Oz6nSRuTcyGirzZiLExWG2L2niRt0pAPk2P7MwhIyVeLNVAaaYuGGicj1CO6VVADBW3yoipjBhSm/32qfOCnAoEoOpPl2RplwvMxpiztfNYu6EYyCdryGpNScbG6HAZyZkvAZH0Ce4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=5021e575.xn--9vv.k1208; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=Rjdlb/wzt2oMFc3LUim9KNJSNPrmkHieTRpeCm+t8XI=; b=TW5EEJ6qC59gMp3JPS2aJi+U75A6lH19j6frFVZDLKC6YJ8NTZUgm17pQ4QTAE2rR8Hi/amEb6c3sIoZxn/QLdvdncPA/EwTnNP4HVakUjyuGqgNma7IrKz2O1mYwhAA+5Zz0Zq5EjnQ60b5xOCfqlQdT0hWeW14LpoVyGJEFK0=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:04:47 -0000
Message-ID: <20120808040447.64729.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1208071937500.20339@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: ole@cisco.com
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:05:11 -0000

>If we restrict European cities to the ones with direct flight 
>connections from other continents, we're really limiting the choices. 

For some of us, if we limit our choices to places with direct flights,
that means Newark, Philadelphia, or Detroit.  Count your blessings.

We can argue about whether Quebec was unduly hard to get to (I didn't
have any problem when I got tickets a month ahead, even though I was
redeeming points), but it seems to me that so long as most people can
get to or from the venue in less than a day for a reasonable amount of
money, it's OK.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email