Re: How I deal with (false positive) IP-address blacklists...

[Peter Dambier <[e-mail]>]

[e-mail] wrote:
> 
> Like it or not, sample size reallly does matter. But if you really do prefer
> individual anecdotal evidence, I'll point out that in practically every bogus
> blocking incident I've seen of late, the fault lies not with an operation like
> Spamhaus, but with some local yokel who thinks he's come up with the FUSSP.
> 

In the case government of austria contra spamhaus that local yokel must have
been  Bundeskanzler Gusenbauer  ?

Neither the austrian government nor their atnic.at is or has been sending
spam nor are they selling domains.

But spamhaus blocked them.

All mailblockers are primarily mailblockers and sometimes they do hit spam.

But it is in this list like in real spam live.

One party believes in the holy blacklist also there are different cults who
believe in their very own blacklist -

and the other party knows all mailblockers are run by the devil and they
can proof it. But a proof is nothing against a belief.

Kind regards
Peter

-- 
Peter and Karin Dambier
Cesidian Root - Radice Cesidiana
Rimbacher Strasse 16
D-69509 Moerlenbach-Bonsweiher
[phone] (Telekom)
[phone] (VoIP: sipgate.de)
mail: [e-mail]
http://www.peter-dambier.de/
http://iason.site.voila.fr/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/iason/
ULA= fd80:4ce1:c66a::/48
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf