Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 04 May 2016 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300CA12D938; Wed, 4 May 2016 14:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SLPNF7hzODXv; Wed, 4 May 2016 14:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C57C12D90E; Wed, 4 May 2016 14:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD442CC9A; Thu, 5 May 2016 00:11:26 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z-O9lfI30Rr7; Thu, 5 May 2016 00:11:25 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487802CC64; Thu, 5 May 2016 00:11:25 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_39551339-62E0-4127-ADC5-9FF55530DE57"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <027101d1a57f$25508a80$6ff19f80$@akayla.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 17:11:23 -0400
Message-Id: <6729728C-8B92-4FAD-BCF7-63C1B70F11FF@piuha.net>
References: <027101d1a57f$25508a80$6ff19f80$@akayla.com>
To: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/U-cCi49Hh4-lWXCoHYd0uUN29Dk>
Cc: draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag.all@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 21:11:29 -0000

Thanks for your review, Peter. I do agree with this:

> Page 5, section 4.2, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: The sentence states:
> "Being part of the Router CAPABILITY TLV, the node administrative tag
> sub-TLV MUST be reasonably small and stable."  If you're going to make this
> a MUST, you've got to at least give a definition of "reasonably small" and
> perhaps even "stable" in the context of this specification.  As it stands,
> there's no test for whether the MUST is enforceable or understandable
> between parties.

Jari