IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPmix.

Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Sun, 20 November 2016 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B32129464 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:05:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pfJOgRsQ0c4m for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:05:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wj0-x234.google.com (mail-wj0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c01::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68BD9129550 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:05:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wj0-x234.google.com with SMTP id xy5so18162734wjc.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:05:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nkDK7F9vSmj5DVZOgOtTNWPOnOs/hpjr/D/OTvaOBlU=; b=ozjWaFclzpVohdTEczM+JincKlHY/I5bzD49LcQVENqPpqXX1d0z3w8bcniCEZBKNK IOQgVMREY3mbjt7UNEcd3aAbTgA9rlp7cNvFmwUJ8DMXxDZ5YBH9aCCQoukUVhn1ne/a zjdwBTGbBitlFDP1MnaIJs0gAKeJdJvsDARfP2ILzlCh0GEZXZJBolx3BTPzbbkZS0WL wwdVxcyY6X71N5tLLYA2Z8ZSZ+Kf/RvFvNYCZrVBI1NN0yhu/GvwQDujBnT+BEyDw8X8 C/9eQjhITFQCVFcF5CrBKX0/ddtPoEmk2Kb2bM+rJ3kfE7U1KHEaCO8MIp1EOUwBCvYF FI/g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nkDK7F9vSmj5DVZOgOtTNWPOnOs/hpjr/D/OTvaOBlU=; b=MZq/tsPs3N2wzgSmGUaJU9zWPpW3oiMXo2IOM8YvLtlaWFKz77FQlLJrNlRKvogLEg dPOObBmIaJj1FYHtC5ibo3CZQOd82GKKvovwCvaSlRdxks5mr/USCnnvORxXsNrbcCbs HL7IWs2pzZmRquvdAb9tQhyHhszyBlcP6g5/muigNtFtRkgLTYaGSsQWQTjHaOkTeB2o LUsKnwm152CZLk8A5ZV6WNSt3mncQ/AMoUUbwXcOuvBuMTGwPYuVdjVI1ylXmdgBBU8T nRtsuVgOErqbtpG8Y62LftrW1DicAGLmEA/yABJ2kwtjjCbu7RLAtAc7S8dizxypi5Zj q5xA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03omm+f+rvFI4ELh3xXzvnkD1zGwtRfLexDkL8abZGCWRBofZJbd7HcfIBRLePZipHM82zjSUidwZDkUKX/
X-Received: by 10.194.246.131 with SMTP id xw3mr6229967wjc.217.1479668727738; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:05:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.11.195 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:05:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR04MB144901D56F1E2DC6A770D2EEBDB20@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <HE1PR04MB144901D56F1E2DC6A770D2EEBDB20@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 04:05:07 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAedzxrYra5P6MywywrUf=A5cTjYLA=uf-x0SyQM3ZepZovjcw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IPmix.
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/U2SH5yy6mrqxKEzYTvlB0EgBx_4>
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:05:31 -0000

I fail to see how introduction of new IP version numbers and packet
formats will help anything at this point.  The operational timescales
involved are staggeringly long.

IPv6 deployment is certainly "unevenly distributed" at the moment, but
basically all the trends are "up and to the right".  See the World
IPv6 Launch measurements website as well as all the published data
from Akamai, APNIC, RIPE, and Google.  The following polynomial
extrapolations of Google data suggest that global IPv6 adoption will
be north of 20% by the end of 2017 and around 35% by the end of 2019:

    https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/project.php?metric=p&timeforward=1280&timebackward=1280&country=ww

Bear in mind that those are global average numbers, and some countries
(hello Belgium) are already at 50%.

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status