Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 08 May 2017 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4376124BE8; Mon, 8 May 2017 15:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j-BK8Hj-5YUX; Mon, 8 May 2017 15:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x236.google.com (mail-wr0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19A531200FC; Mon, 8 May 2017 15:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x236.google.com with SMTP id z52so55911671wrc.2; Mon, 08 May 2017 15:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bvZwFeBKOpn3zmOdduGxZxz4nx3C5F2aXmUevdpGyX4=; b=HTgbzrHoJI9D5F+sUXlf93JfsVBblGPfh171fZ+8V7bWjj58K43aKEssE9i6FCYLkx deR+SbR/lZhrMUbQxNSR+YY3gdV7Sdx0yuAIdcDEjTd88Q4chdxiJqJR9vaWoB6CFdaC gY4NaYjIP/gFauprMcF6l9WDbu7ZSmtqE31i+O0ZtCN9MPTTNQ5F8bWpY62wWK6c8QMB pCm2vgmMAWkplLOM2Ih4DvSezMHKTMKn0TsbpkvB3HUPYNLFAuc6BnygVdiTN65NIThE 7wzR1Bdy3Khnw7PiFnXor9u1S+2j3F4rwL+hWEZ+s5LgzSTHrC5C/l6ZNsKddR12vyEx b4hw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bvZwFeBKOpn3zmOdduGxZxz4nx3C5F2aXmUevdpGyX4=; b=ORulXaiTfRXlM8Y863dBi2JqqEJHfhNdFZzHNjaJ754IHRWR+ueO4Ku+BjMCX57dyi R1fKG5AccHmX0IJdEecZ2jkao8x6FSogv4zQM2dASVZtLo2zQxUrcLELLf70dY3bsOYU JFPfnN7f+0HkrO3Yn0tK3s4+3ZCkd4axaMfv35Xg+SpH7f72XJ4NoFpmo+hxNz4gS7fy /UvSbvotKrIk5IpKZ2L+vzFCaZ2W1w2U7UMtm6D9yMs3GRmCLhjyFT77FHsvwaQgkMPU bFn4YD3bNprkTWbZXIYil5Zl1yX7umMKvPLPYn5tGvKCyh13RBPmgMW3g7xUVRakaebd QLsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcA32ukmP7Pxuf2sqUiYlU++U999MuXIjw6FJ8ukv0l9TJ4phZ7V XsIw3Uqlu00XNjTRtv2WhZsNZnBlj9Ps
X-Received: by 10.46.0.70 with SMTP id 67mr7516197lja.113.1494283177290; Mon, 08 May 2017 15:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.83.2 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2017 15:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2A376548-9BB0-4D7B-81C6-1BD951227FEA@kuehlewind.net>
References: <149144445494.22036.11923880719369865745@ietfa.amsl.com> <DB6PR0701MB24543D95D78557DDEACA2D71951E0@DB6PR0701MB2454.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnWAn9r4ZGtVq6yLyYcC7w5rDy4dV+98q0K__Nnm2UfRew@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR0701MB2459B2173C921635A61CC24695100@HE1PR0701MB2459.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <2A376548-9BB0-4D7B-81C6-1BD951227FEA@kuehlewind.net>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 08:39:36 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUiyvokXWbgWFp96in3=Ge5PUhoKjNNZpxhykaMTyxQ-A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08
To: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Cc: "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost.all@ietf.org>, "Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay)" <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/U68ROlgVmxk5RlHg0DuNkHVT_gU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 22:39:41 -0000

Yes, I believe that the changes made were sufficient.

On 8 May 2017 at 22:15, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <ietf@kuehlewind.net>; wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> just to double check: do you think this document is ready now and all your comments have been addressed?
>
> Mirja
>
>
>> Am 27.04.2017 um 13:57 schrieb Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>;:
>>
>> Hello Martin,
>>
>> I just posted an update where the " Requirements Language" text has been moved in a section 1.1.
>> As I saw it on a number of other ietf drafts, I also added the sentence
>> "When the words appear in lower case, their natural language meaning is used."
>>
>> The update and status are available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost/
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sabine
>>
>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: 26 April 2017 08:39
>>>> To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-
>>>> bell-labs.com>
>>>> Cc: art@ietf.org; alto@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-alto-multi-
>>>> cost.all@ietf.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08
>>>>
>>>> On 26 April 2017 at 03:26, Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay)
>>>> <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>; wrote:
>>>>>>> This document doesn't cite RFC 2119, but it uses the keywords.
>>>>> [SR     ] RFC 2119 is cited on page 1, section " Requirements Language" and
>>>> section "9.1.  Normative References". Should it be referenced elsewhere?
>>>>
>>>> The convention is to put those in the body, I missed it in the boilerplate.
>>>>
>>>> I skimmed the other changes, and they look fine.
>