Re: 6lowpan over wire, specifically over powerline?

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Mon, 28 March 2016 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=189516b983=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABF912DB1E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WtxCWzE7uIpO for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.com (mail.consulintel.com [213.0.69.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EF0412DAB2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.com, Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:05:58 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.212] by mail.consulintel.com (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50000379259.msg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:05:57 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.com, Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:05:57 +0200 (not processed: spam filter heuristic analysis disabled)
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Return-Path: prvs=189516b983=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.160212
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:05:55 +0200
Subject: Re: 6lowpan over wire, specifically over powerline?
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <63B53DC9-838C-433B-A7B5-5F8E66C68771@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: 6lowpan over wire, specifically over powerline?
References: <852C9AF7-A5C5-4F49-B2DE-A997F4DB576E@frobbit.se> <5909.1459176439@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <5909.1459176439@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UBW_IcGWIvZpqZeIpWCHEIlsZg8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 15:08:53 -0000

We worked in a project “6POWER” to implement IPv6, including QoS and multicast a few years ago, including the main chip set vendor for PLC, DS2, a Spanish company, leading in this field, which was later on acquired by Marvell.

At that time, the chip sets support 802.3 by default, 

All the documents are still available at:

http://www.6power.org/


I guess it will be interesting to apply 6lowpan here as well, but usually the scope of those networks and the bandwidth available in very low cost chip sets (clready up to 600 Mbits at that time), wat not a problem, bay be now there are other considerations that are relevant.

Regards,
Jordi









-----Mensaje original-----
De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Responder a: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Fecha: lunes, 28 de marzo de 2016, 16:47
Para: Patrik =?utf-8?b?RsOkbHRzdHLDtm0=?= <paf@frobbit.se>
CC: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Asunto: Re: 6lowpan over wire, specifically over powerline?

>
>Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> wrote:
>    > This is a shot in the dark, but has anyone been looking at implementing
>    > things like 6lowpan on wire protocols, specifically over power lines?
>    > In a standardized way? There seems to be hundreds (well...) of
>    > proprietary solutions, but what about interoperable gear?
>
>My understanding is that a quite a number of Powerline protocols are
>essentially 802.15.4 with a AC-transformer rather than an antenna, and so
>there is really nothing to do.   The other ones which exist (going back to
>X.10...) have monolithic protocol stacks, and few can run IP at all.
>
>--
>Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>