Re: Complaint to AD regarding further censorship of MODPOD list
Chris Box <chris.box.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 05 September 2025 17:41 UTC
Return-Path: <chris.box.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CA85E1780F for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 10:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0v9Eg5W2Pmrq for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 10:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E5FC5E17808 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 10:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-61ebe5204c2so3358153a12.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Sep 2025 10:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1757094106; x=1757698906; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DZpgw4PC7EEuSjN30G0FDhRQ0r+UMLBbIyl/UPfYScE=; b=SfZq9T5qBJRm/fY2Av7dS/1k1BgnSbMYIDOJKQn5WNIGEqN3xoh5Ejh4ZZEVFs/RLp cLet7bjA/AtuuqfXE6+EU6EUIU7Fs40YOAKwFxPH4IDwnOvSf9WigI+hzbrixAEEUKTE tWtmGOE6obi0QUDIulCmZdCG1zT6OjAAx19K4/JwVPEwOj7qkWHg5pyd1NQ4dQ5WA1uO bS/H0VrZgTQk8onH80ilirVkpsl9RMuByc+y4jaJ6Sa/rQw9GU1HT6u3aJoxrGDpJVbD SXHd87dq1PtH1p9qWPHwRvBYOPcdVepg9m/ExpOrigHMk0VprBXLJdTJutkPTE5unzsU fxEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1757094106; x=1757698906; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=DZpgw4PC7EEuSjN30G0FDhRQ0r+UMLBbIyl/UPfYScE=; b=dLqeWizxJtr48hGwTW6158auFfVLDkpMXIL+c3wQw7XAQmQ8G7QH6anq8cMclLkWR5 YCT8pN+8vuH9DL5R6jITHiTsPp4NegMH2pCvm9+xusP8RzqZfTQb7Mhboy/5uP0MwukR Q93OEKWrIZGIvnbIy38YF+raqyG2VhhksmJwznKloeu1PfNN01L3IClSibqtHZagVqqk gyqtdSKFqtird5dNdqkEyLEQXw7SnDg5ogK5pDxpngiCrmHGeM9WDUkFjlrkF6GGKqeP A1ULkLLkWQrvWx3vHVza2AvHRrh71X2B6pxwVxycJIH84nzs0s9p94v8+arR/AZRxHxB yZEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw+XUeGmTmaE4FYXt/if9R7bIw77+ccAk5R77DvHcA7dXR1HTIQ 6JdXSzgvvUgweSnfsCvcLUrTgQSjYj8hnKiOhF+l76HQElmw7L/bfX+msdwBPy4XaNZOZ64gUuw 9pUye9eJpuIFUi2/SZsLYA5jZwkfnKuk=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsXs1zhfeu0YOzEITlzMx3NaQeZp9ba4nyJphGJDBssEUYW6f6L5grPzLufnGc wLbNzIhRtVzo2mvxLniN4XnwDQ2ebWKwRYIUeAnIa7q40+mzI7RmaCzw1VQ9RAZk1++O4v6wgOK h/0P6CxSS1jkm2j7ZtAl1GRmI4FW0PwMgOAjTA3nzg7JufTXugAPTQvP69lGpnBkE1zWEZQTewV dM3P8xj
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEhutUuxlX/fZOU6Q3z8784KAz9kTALXnJcLzs/hjEArUfLUxwD70iz5S0AjKJliMgPTIagY9X9e94CN9f++CU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:13ca:b0:61d:107e:9c28 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-61d2687249bmr19306163a12.1.1757094106064; Fri, 05 Sep 2025 10:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AA1D6B62-58F9-435B-A416-B29B90AB57EA@nohats.ca> <CAKr6gn1J2f2-fONdxfeKE9b3xo2D4B-8CYDehgNP-HO=XvNYqw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn1J2f2-fONdxfeKE9b3xo2D4B-8CYDehgNP-HO=XvNYqw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Box <chris.box.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 18:41:34 +0100
X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXyavPhrrtQPlV-TIQx4GiFbg6Khg1QQgsDQw0PsjUG5uUlr0n4fTWm_79A
Message-ID: <CACJ6M171ahTCBqXTFNyvY_dEor-ObGRwqQDFYWQHc5ffq_tGcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Complaint to AD regarding further censorship of MODPOD list
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000076d17063e115a0e"
Message-ID-Hash: GEMLL6C2LIMBW4VUPDSNL2MWR7NXI4QD
X-Message-ID-Hash: GEMLL6C2LIMBW4VUPDSNL2MWR7NXI4QD
X-MailFrom: chris.box.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UCSMu30MO_CBuJFQo8QWEtJZKbc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>
On Fri, 5 Sept 2025 at 01:26, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> wrote: > I am writing in a personal capacity. > > Please don't make fun of potential or actual litigants on the list. > Thank you George for reminding us of this before I had a chance to. Writing as a moderator of the IETF list, I will strengthen your statement to say that the Note Well applies to all lists, which incorporates the following Guidelines for Conduct. 1. IETF participants extend respect and courtesy to their colleagues at all times. 2. IETF participants have impersonal discussions. 3. IETF participants devise solutions for the global Internet that meet the needs of diverse technical and operational environments. 4. Individuals are prepared to contribute to the ongoing work of the group . The IETF list in particular has a relatively narrow scope of acceptable topics, which are described in RFC9245 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9245.html>. DJ Bernstein, you requested that all subsequent discussion of this appeal be posted here. I'm currently failing to see on what basis such discussion would comply with 9245. I would be grateful if you could describe why you think it's compliant, by sending this to moderators@ietf.org. Other list members are also welcome to share their thoughts on this to us, so that the moderator team can come to a decision on in-or-out-of-scope early next week. Chris
- Complaint to AD regarding further censorship of M… D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Complaint to AD regarding further censorship … Salz, Rich
- Re: Complaint to AD regarding further censorship … Tom Beecher
- Re: Complaint to AD regarding further censorship … Michael De Roover
- Re: Complaint to AD regarding further censorship … Michael De Roover
- Re: Complaint to AD regarding further censorship … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Complaint to AD regarding further censorship … Watson Ladd
- Re: Complaint to AD regarding further censorship … Paul Wouters
- Re: Complaint to AD regarding further censorship … George Michaelson
- Re: Complaint to AD regarding further censorship … Chris Box
- Re: Complaint to AD regarding further censorship … Chris Box