IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Historic

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 20 November 2013 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24911AE13E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:09:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hOy8s7B3QTtl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:09:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-x232.google.com (mail-qc0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3351AE45D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:09:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id i7so6186683qcq.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:09:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=QsMH6FPkZHlx4lqq7yrLnRqXrvC+P8AJRbwbAvGdUcc=; b=TEA5btz0MfYk20LlmoOy7yL9OTN+frxaRje6ZEhBCDOE5j4ht+/MamVea2AZ5yqfLI evnMWXl/MzEP6LJxl0YBz2+DGnLto2oI1S458eT8Bk4Q0khJggifcAPimvQfYuILCTkn 3JQ2Se+u+z/1kGP/2C2jx8S/41SdMbAViGKV71rGQ6abb9W4Fu4AGUHc7IkYvlSKw91q YCIRg0qkn48bSe88uk1oncIlM340LiAfMwoRiWppOdrfNqk+ntJwRuE6TA3sRpsa9tj3 IakNftE7IqeX2gxgnkLJKkxe7K58R+OqjgzFcTmCIaSoEVRMSS/P1lO5CcJVUPurDrlX XIAQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.24.202 with SMTP id w10mr4593805qef.12.1384974563943; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:09:23 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.224.66.194 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:09:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <528CFCBC.30200@cisco.com>
References: <20131002145238.78084.qmail@joyce.lan> <524D846A.6030905@tana.it> <CAC4RtVBb9FVtmjK4X5hCQpMorHnjmyJLU1sYbNh==iBh8SqztQ@mail.gmail.com> <528CF075.9000204@dcrocker.net> <528CFCBC.30200@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:09:23 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: DuJvQQ2JTMMvUCWnPc-Jyyw08gs
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+E=84jTJxfP7dGx=kVHN1DE1b3TyYhRA3454Z0oK+J-w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Historic
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, John Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:09:32 -0000

> If someone is willing to write the document and explain why ADSP has
> been moved to Historic, that's good for capturing lessons learned.  I
> don't think it's required for the status change, but a bonus.

Do you think that more than this is necessary?:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-adsp-rfc5617-to-historic/

I should, in particular, direct that question to John, as he's the one
who brought up the question of documenting why... so I am adding John
to the "To" here.

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email