Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Sat, 03 April 2021 00:42 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA063A11AB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 17:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gctcRMV1QhJ5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 17:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.suchdamage.org (mail.suchdamage.org [52.9.186.167]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 001EF3A11A9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 17:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A775303F8; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 20:42:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.suchdamage.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WFa1tNz6Sh3t; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 20:42:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (unknown [66.30.213.255]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) (Authenticated sender: hartmans-laptop) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 20:42:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 92533CA892; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 20:42:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Cc: 'Sam Hartman' <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, 'Brian E Carpenter' <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, 'Keith Moore' <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
References: <859352252.4167919.1617264911078.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <859352252.4167919.1617264911078@mail.yahoo.com> <85575541-C896-4530-B028-C0DF9BA3EA8B@ietf.org> <411426886.24320.1617306016731@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <20210401195735.GA3828@localhost> <20210402032059.GD79563@kduck.mit.edu> <1e4feea2-2c81-b31a-04e3-d4c9a4adbaf7@lounge.org> <20210402163230.GH79563@kduck.mit.edu> <4c82de79-1e40-2eed-909b-8a288284393d@lounge.org> <439a33c9-5791-4c90-76a3-54aab828a37d@network-heretics.com> <5C955F3B-2EE7-43DD-85BA-DA1C1CF353F1@tzi.org> <7b3ba302-ec36-eb8d-7461-861a0b6651ac@network-heretics.com> <0dca7a0d-d51e-4c67-cc96-a44de0141480@gmail.com> <9c369a34-d47c-3af0-9793-8342f5f6ec63@network-heretics.com> <c613095d-f0b4-8df7-e703-d1b3c52bffc5@gmail.com> <tslpmzctgoi.fsf@suchdamage.org> <005701d7281d$a19ccf10$e4d66d30$@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 20:42:41 -0400
In-Reply-To: <005701d7281d$a19ccf10$e4d66d30$@acm.org> (Larry Masinter's message of "Fri, 2 Apr 2021 17:09:35 -0700")
Message-ID: <tsllfa0tczi.fsf@suchdamage.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UGsdqUCA7EPC7JICcUSo0fRt0cA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 00:42:48 -0000

>>>>> "Larry" == Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org> writes:

    Larry> One way to assess intent is correlate with the amount of
    Larry> effort put into finding other, less offensive methods of
    Larry> making a point.

Why assess that?
If I know I'm skating close to an edge that is likely to get my audience
to be upset, I can explicitly talk about why I chose what I did and work
on building connection and empathy with them.

You don't need to assess my intent; you can instead look at what I
actually did, including the steps I chose to find empathy (and wrote
about) as part of the mix.