IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Wed, 12 April 2017 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E4912EA81; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fS2CDi3bpzm2; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 698B9129506; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mbp-4.local ([IPv6:2620:11a:c081:20:b029:cf01:225c:cf4b]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v3CGEKvw010934 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:14:21 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: nagasaki.bogus.com: Host [IPv6:2620:11a:c081:20:b029:cf01:225c:cf4b] claimed to be mbp-4.local
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, iaoc@ietf.org, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <E67FDB14-9895-48E0-A334-167172D322DB@nohats.ca> <20170403152624.GA11714@gsp.org> <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com> <E068F01A-B720-4E7A-A60F-AA5BDA22D535@consulintel.es> <20170404181505.GA4004@localhost> <CAAQiQRcvu-BfBA_NEqZwXsHEn6ujpa2=w7P5Vu2f6GLXjKqkcA@mail.gmail.com> <20170404202446.GB4004@localhost> <2987213d-075e-beff-64f8-d316709c404a@cs.tcd.ie> <20170404204617.GC16732@puck.nether.net> <3D4D193E-0D41-44DD-BB0C-E7741A7A2260@gmail.com> <20170404221042.GC4004@localhost> <7E834C8D-FCFB-48C4-925A-73B5FDEC60FD@consulintel.es> <102DED0B-F1CD-4C65-8AA2-5270227EECCC@consulintel.es> <697AB8AC-BD17-47D6-94C7-B80186500699@consulintel.es> <AD2AF7CA-ACAB-4642-BA6A-FB77423CD74F@fugue.com> <AC7E6A0F-923B-4DF9-81E2-3575EA156F86@consulintel.es>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Message-ID: <7c61933d-1cbd-75d6-cdbc-dbf2fa60792b@bogus.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:14:15 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AC7E6A0F-923B-4DF9-81E2-3575EA156F86@consulintel.es>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6rDk12mG5druORR2jdJeHx6AjdATadAJP"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UQhQnG_m1f2_jsjYimz6HGOvy1U>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:15:02 -0000

On 4/12/17 07:01, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> So, you mean they don’t use email?
>
> Sounds surprising to me, despite for sure they had some time in Chicago to decide about what can be said to the community about the SF meeting. If they haven’t considered that, I guess we need an IAOC with more focus on what is the most relevant and important topic right now for the community.
>
> By the way, it seems that they haven’t met anyway since August 2015, as they promised me to respond to one of my emails regarding some spam/email bouncing issues and the way we are managing so, and I’ve been waiting since them. Really nice and respectful way to support the community.
As a mailing list moderator who sees a fair amount of bounces, It is
notable that you mta routinly bounces messages to various lists for
reasons that from from the header appear to be disliking the sender. How
you run your MTAm since it is yours, is obviously up to you.

joel
> Regards,
> Jordi
>  
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
> Responder a: <mellon@fugue.com>
> Fecha: miércoles, 12 de abril de 2017, 15:26
> Para: <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
> CC: <iaoc@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
> Asunto: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
>
>     On Apr 12, 2017, at 4:53 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
>     Do we need to ask again and again every day?
>     
>     
>     
>     
>     
>     Has the IAOC met since the first time you asked?
>     
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.consulintel.es
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email