IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-hansen-nonkeywords-non2119-04.txt

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> Thu, 03 March 2016 12:31 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6261A92FE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 04:31:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.544
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.544 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a9Eo0ZwZYV03 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 04:31:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (b2b-5-10-171-186.unitymedia.biz [5.10.171.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DF4A1A92F1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 04:30:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix, from userid 117) id D5A1F15A2E83; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 13:30:33 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=greenbytes.de; s=mail; t=1457008233; bh=tO/RZYsFFz/FLGMvrGkOs3RH67m2WjUQH4ufL5HQeZU=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ic8KS1Qd7sIMSbG0t9u1KLrcbsgL6B8rdL5s7FWeIdVsgGxmGHjDb83VH+xe70oXX 6vIWbKXmjN0bsEzGHG2IrI6IzsZkMidNcgcscMo3RILjXp/LmNGGzGhDvnPjkUDk01 HiFK1pVk2C/12/HAzPA8mK9/Xb7a6NbLmmFKXzMQ=
Received: from [192.168.1.123] (unknown [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8981615A0582; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 13:30:33 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=greenbytes.de; s=mail; t=1457008233; bh=tO/RZYsFFz/FLGMvrGkOs3RH67m2WjUQH4ufL5HQeZU=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ic8KS1Qd7sIMSbG0t9u1KLrcbsgL6B8rdL5s7FWeIdVsgGxmGHjDb83VH+xe70oXX 6vIWbKXmjN0bsEzGHG2IrI6IzsZkMidNcgcscMo3RILjXp/LmNGGzGhDvnPjkUDk01 HiFK1pVk2C/12/HAzPA8mK9/Xb7a6NbLmmFKXzMQ=
Subject: Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-hansen-nonkeywords-non2119-04.txt
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <20160226210636.7050.26087.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56D7E15F.3000307@dcrocker.net>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Message-ID: <56D82E6D.4020105@greenbytes.de>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 13:30:37 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56D7E15F.3000307@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UScZnIOVlKVvgcwzsnadVVDbMcw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:31:02 -0000

On 2016-03-03 08:01, Dave Crocker wrote:
> Folks,
>
> G'day.  We'd like to see whether there is interest in getting the
> enclosed published.
>
> It's meant as a helpful suggestion for avoiding possible confusion in
> the use of vocabulary the IETF treats as normative.
>
> The latest version works a bit harder to avoid appearing, itself, to be
> giving normative direction...
>
> d/

Absolutely, go ahead!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email