Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting

Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> Fri, 03 August 2012 07:25 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F9A21E8041 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 00:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jlIv-KL6IuTa for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 00:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srv01.frobbit.se (srv01.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F98721E8034 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 00:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by srv01.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C29144C88C6; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 09:25:36 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at frobbit.se
Received: from srv01.frobbit.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv01.frobbit.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lU+kldU+Ki0k; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 09:25:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffc::14] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffc::14]) (Authenticated sender: paf01) by srv01.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06EDC144C88C3; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 09:25:36 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1485\))
Subject: Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <501B7B43.70202@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:25:35 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <BF8D9FB8-E584-45C2-9CD6-4289F2DF303F@frobbit.se>
References: <20120802184436.87A0318C11F@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <B6033EB2-3B90-4524-A123-38852C5E2698@virtualized.org> <4401D68C-F9BB-4777-845A-A7011C50F1EA@cs.columbia.edu> <501B7B43.70202@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1485)
Cc: Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 07:25:46 -0000

3 aug 2012 kl. 09:18 skrev Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>:

> Exactly. It is intended to defeat the Internet's historical growth model
> of independence from national administrations and monopolies, by imposing
> a geographical addressing scheme. Since the Internet actually works with
> a topological addressing scheme, the effect is to force the topology
> to be congruent with the geography. If you want central control, that's
> a desirable result.

The key here is control.

Innovation in the core, or at the edge.

License/politically based or need based allocation.

The rest is implementation.

   Patrik