Re: Document diffs... Re: A sad farewell

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 06 November 2020 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7963A0BA1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 11:47:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CgCj75rPo1_q for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 11:47:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 742683A0CC0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 11:47:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc60.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CSW9x5KmzzyS8; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 20:47:01 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Subject: Re: Document diffs... Re: A sad farewell
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwg_Q-zqAtJZc95HhtTw7NcT3GeXgYWW+8WtecG3cEhK+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 20:47:01 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 626384821.292287-13ba09527ddea6016fb14b05bed89056
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BC944083-EE5B-40EA-BE9C-0FF9C7364434@tzi.org>
References: <b0ca070f-dd1f-1b8d-940c-7e4c57ea8393@cisco.com> <5fa3ffbe.1c69fb81.a621e.78ba@mx.google.com> <MN2PR15MB3103C6573396210E2CA7274D97EE0@MN2PR15MB3103.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <E971F6B0-EFF1-4E1D-8CCB-80FA7FEB722D@gmail.com> <20201105174127.GF1750809@mit.edu> <6f1fcd3a-c3cf-a9a7-7aaf-af327d337f43@mnt.se> <CAKq15vcBBGhwAd76LEQDhEa+e1XcTr2HGnmJw9J9y9znbjFMAw@mail.gmail.com> <174AC0A1-77B5-4B6B-AD9D-7C9FB6023BC1@episteme.net> <CAKq15vc947QrG0KgTdP2kiLpE_8YXbEWMZfyFqaGRdJ4me-Mxg@mail.gmail.com> <CE739672-72C4-44B7-821A-99AE400F574C@akamai.com> <CAKq15vdEVfk4ST+WEk06hdgVxMtUU=GKwZwTjtoUSxvEouHRfg@mail.gmail.com> <6FCC5D7B-2EDC-4191-AA0F-BE91211B9B07@akamai.com> <CAKq15vcRAu8VrDmZ-44z3vy8r=1Rx-AA0Xwsg84JFRjpX+=Ypg@mail.gmail.com> <CE764E62-AC69-4339-B4ED-A0D0044E995E@strayalpha.com> <CAMm+LwiwBz9xs6SSVZepxLru+qGN7KYKHeE2=58gxMf0Ay_eCA@mail.gmail.com> <6F08619A-046B-4A36-8623-546CD87A73FC@strayalpha.com> <CAMm+Lwg_Q-zqAtJZc95HhtTw7NcT3GeXgYWW+8WtecG3cEhK+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UYSfNJi7n7HAKNqXp4T1k7SZzj4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 19:47:07 -0000

> 
> Carsten has a legacy thing

That is a fun subject, and maybe something that can actually give back to the discussion that this subject has forked off from.

In the IETF, drafts often have a long and protracted life.
Over a time of half a decade and more.
So stability in the authoring formats is gold.
(Which irks me, because there are some small aspects of kramdown-rfc I would otherwise improve [on the other hand, I am surprised how well it kept over its first decade].)

How is this relevant to the main thread discussion?
Only someone who is familiar with the actual work can properly assess (or even come up with) this “requirement” (read: objective with a strong weighting).
We need to treat people who have acquired this familiarity (and have the intellectual versatility to actively make use of it) with respect.
(Even if they happen to straddle the boundary between respected community member and “just a contractor”(*).)

Grüße, Carsten

(*) You know where you heard this phrase first.