IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Predictable Internet Time

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 03 January 2017 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A0F129467 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:22:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bK1mkDOj6itF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:21:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 135EC12945E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:21:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E19209F7; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:21:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from web1 ([10.202.2.211]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:21:58 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=6e tKsnNpIOKwRc/qUJaJbY5ro/s=; b=kmDSsCIqLX5a4nVRekyxE2N1efhA7eOvZH UvBdvY/SkKwmcA7fRT0KfEZXY4d18watvHhyqfMC2MwT/IzvnA3t6N4pVXFjVOMV qTnX7hWwz0RQRFNDGgC1Opy75XgXQoTf99wAgCG8uZWhLw2Sas2/cAtVdl5+h9ic 7pY09kl4Q=
X-ME-Sender: <xms:5gdsWBUSk7fWyBnl8EyadM1ADBe1i18qjGfM6t3RRndJLlpJeexzig>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 2D9A8AA6C5; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:21:58 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <1483474918.1346083.836313393.2699EBD5@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_148347491813460830"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-9c115fcf
Subject: Re: Predictable Internet Time
References: <CAMm+LwgfQJ8aG5wB=d3fRbbeje3J9o7Z4_DCuP8DL88ouDeKzw@mail.gmail.com> <9F0F8841-BC1D-4C27-83EF-8F93F33FB021@puck.nether.net> <CAMm+Lwh5JMn+JxPB3Q3RKpeibckVSB2Fqm_RajcnU28OAx=jOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:21:58 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwh5JMn+JxPB3Q3RKpeibckVSB2Fqm_RajcnU28OAx=jOw@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UZTKccHl438UulWdT-raxmsEUSE>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:22:00 -0000


"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:

>

> Looking at the problem of time smear, I think Google's 20 hour
> as opposed
> to 24 hours approach is probably best.



Google plan to switch from 20h leap smear to 24h



https://developers.google.com/time/smear



Tony.

--

f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/  -  I xn--
  zr8h punycode

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email