IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 15 January 2015 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935621B2DC3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:54:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ijoR_hDJuuWa for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:54:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E79B31B2DD1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:54:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-8-156.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t0FGsJHQ010922 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:54:23 -0800
Message-ID: <54B7F0AC.7000302@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:54:04 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
References: <ED473823-2B1E-4431-8B42-393D20BA72DF@piuha.net> <54AC505B.8090802@nostrum.com> <8EFCB6B4-0D95-459E-A316-DB29C3945A33@cooperw.in> <54B58523.4070308@nostrum.com> <CABmDk8nHOEsVxz9bF-Y+Mgbj4DCEKPZoOgtP8Wp7vFBAUWcVmg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABmDk8nHOEsVxz9bF-Y+Mgbj4DCEKPZoOgtP8Wp7vFBAUWcVmg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UZkZTT5UMGEzXEe78NYaV9xgeRo>
Cc: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:54:26 -0000

On 1/15/2015 8:36 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
> IMHO, the workload issue could be much more effectively handled by
> taking better advantage of directorates.


+1   (well, really, +10)


d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email