Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Tue, 04 July 2017 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3328D1326F8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jb4J4c0W7tkk for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22c.google.com (mail-pg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37914132702 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id k14so37357990pgr.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 11:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version; bh=Jexy41v/+ZGD/RsRqU2r1QcdaAAVQO273l/x2IdhIMI=; b=Myj3Fqigmn4hi3uTCqHoYSFcWobukSeh+J1KW0y5gXEzNbMwMvZt61qYNBKKDtjLCD /9Z5fxmMNp3Mxy0hdYIO46lTAezRDIpPAayi6AzI9J3j0CrU4AOkF/5poq24J9mQEA/q SkpCVsaXDa9UcbGQ2dQr4LlfR7h+4m7WakSou+x35aWVITbkr1r27lvRXG2F4R9TdpCc FY952cCgMvRHqFhLi02LXODiCUWNz8rhCXm51lCz80bbnTNuSv03Jdva0dCAZn9BV0JB yiqsYk7HMmn5cgHn1H+3S/ru/YsWZ0XGtX5lulvRaRtnjbkmsUI2Rz134vbvr9GzS8v2 oQBw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version; bh=Jexy41v/+ZGD/RsRqU2r1QcdaAAVQO273l/x2IdhIMI=; b=X7A/Ptf4FONLsv2HUpRMjiN3J5B6MrhS6VuTrgk/Ii3v/+G0D1KTzcOf3dvBRGlCtD 2gLbX7iHcus0xaoOwmkFHfjZkRRT8NUhu8TfduyEhJIAHYhGKYj6goDeE/ajrhUi7pWN oFnw4B3h5DySz2+R+8MHEKAaVI5gtu3bw8OCqF/xCAXgTnPTZ4ChXBtTfVfowLhkLiC7 a7ec/U4xNE+rtCWzo2HL+6xD6PeyFX3JwEuF4lFLMkQtezAkDymjhEN5mewofUV2nWKl 7GympqBwY+KVKRg4tcFNQcdmA8fPe2lG88OBgFe4qThWoAAe6ovp3d2xtgEkeltIqOK/ reMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110D25bhu4ch/UuFr8zZLhtdnSB9JPy2sDMe6BJv2ZSGmQVugksd 6+9uTS0kZeEonjDe
X-Received: by 10.84.132.39 with SMTP id 36mr17555043ple.237.1499191924881; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 11:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.7.50] (c-24-6-172-77.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.172.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l22sm42659218pfb.55.2017.07.04.11.12.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Jul 2017 11:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:07:30 -0700
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>, william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5156fc17-9db9-4ddb-8e6f-4210243d8550@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <595BD773.8050502@redbarn.org>
References: <CAHw9_iJQ31wqLavOhtMpPOBhGP4j6CLk45KHGdX5vOA+qj4nQA@mail.gmail.com> <m2a84kzm4y.wl-randy@psg.com> <F98FEA1C-3F3F-4344-8B07-996AAD899CC2@fugue.com> <m2shicxr0h.wl-randy@psg.com> <A70FD34B-000A-4748-B1B2-BF6DF66C7D6C@fugue.com> <m2podgxq97.wl-randy@psg.com> <5F120298-CD66-4CB6-9DC5-0C5DF6F02CC7@fugue.com> <CACfw2hhx+-Z=7ZnnaOkToc+Bd7aKDpBFt+nFUxkt9sKqLn4D8Q@mail.gmail.com> <2DF1AFC7-643B-4610-8EB8-0616D3D0B024@fugue.com> <595BD53E.60701@redbarn.org> <E739C1CB-E60E-4B4B-99CF-1E6C68CB6926@rfc1035.com> <595BD773.8050502@redbarn.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes
X-Readdle-Message-ID: 5156fc17-9db9-4ddb-8e6f-4210243d8550@Spark
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="595bda71_643c9869_da49"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/U_3nVsOqLQY0IgBMJpPkH4AwQU8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 18:12:07 -0000

Paul,

On Jul 4, 2017, 10:59 AM -0700, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>rg>, wrote:

> > > On 4 Jul 2017, at 18:49, Paul Vixie<paul@redbarn.org> wrote:
> > > while IETF governs the protocol, ICANN only governs the IN class.

Sorry, could you point me to anything that documents this?  My impression has always been that ICANN governs (I'd prefer the term coordinates myself) what "the community" feels it should coordinate. I don't recall this being limited to a particular DNS class, but I might have missed it.

> nobody ever got a bonus for making things simpler.

Oh sure they have.

Thanks,
-drc