Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Sun, 04 May 2014 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367211A0025 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 May 2014 01:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0gkJkAZ7g2DB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 May 2014 01:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E121A002A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 May 2014 01:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id vb8so843325obc.28 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 May 2014 01:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Wm7GOUK+r6bA1Arpgu3dkGKR9k2U+HNfNRR2JbvPj20=; b=It834u8jPtLfFTI+AoiI7TDbaqFeBJ+0KpxTehJvq6+gfGPurrJI+KWoMM6qumgzu2 Q3hfCTCvCXzoWh8BvlV4RiruTqY69fgc/D5+aCFGAwKtYWJehi9ucK2cwC8bdxLV12HS bA6s89M7dwh6DefkBX1y3X3EiHfieZGJ0znGw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Wm7GOUK+r6bA1Arpgu3dkGKR9k2U+HNfNRR2JbvPj20=; b=UJeOo3z5RyK7oJayqOyJQgchx6Ba+mmbR1g9TwQtQNq1fy+mGzU/Oyp97quX8+fLAW I1EjQIVg9wBjEaidiUTpQZ/fn+MQi9ooAxWQxafoNGPeTmTAjrx2DUQpXhi4fCYPwdYj CS+9Ab6CHHvsV9/KVhKbfxN72dEoEkJazxL59HwKyuZ4M9PaK4P22ztlpvngKfm5KHa/ eNi49CFgSxjOKps735mk6WgfNWvHMKXMOXTtpyf20uySUS3K3qvpJofNcoMKDKgpeyqL vtTYikgOg/oVvLlMLS4GVg7LHknjKicW2rYeZ8EDipBs26QKBiaivWb9h9D6ZvjFNQaw 3WlA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkSmh+7XTT1b52UtNXe1h4H0ilozhRvKcB26CRECMoGKp3AAYenGS470pdk1nBrmO60lxUZ
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.112.231 with SMTP id it7mr24915740obb.8.1399192918723; Sun, 04 May 2014 01:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.60.100 with HTTP; Sun, 4 May 2014 01:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53638BB1.10704@tana.it>
References: <EB423B81-41F2-480D-B1EE-80E1753E1CDB@iab.org> <53618BDD.1080900@isi.edu> <5361B341.4000200@gmail.com> <53638BB1.10704@tana.it>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 09:41:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzx3N_uBso07j2n0h7j_Rv7bppkkNqc4dLt9V_+6mSJ5jg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149c9f8e4a44204f88efcef
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UdGdmUhzSQd4nF9742xwdTa-ZRU
Cc: IAB <iab@iab.org>, "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 08:42:03 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 08:42:03 -0000

On 2 May 2014 13:12, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:

> On Thu 01/May/2014 04:36:49 +0200 Melinda Shore wrote:
> >
> > I'm thinking of IPSec, newer DNS features, etc.  I think it's very
> > much in the interest of the IETF to have someone around who can
> > talk to some of the language standards bodies about how to expose
> > protocol features, how to deal with options, etc.
>
> +1.  But I don't think the call refers to "language standards".  C and
> C++, in particular, don't standardize such fundamental features as
> multithreading.


C++11 has multithreading in both the model and the standard library - I
suspect you may well be a few years out of date.

Dave.