Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
Michael Dillon <wavetossed@googlemail.com> Wed, 18 February 2009 22:07 UTC
Return-Path: <wavetossed@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543873A67B5 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:07:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.477
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OQC499tfWgrR for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:07:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f161.google.com (mail-bw0-f161.google.com [209.85.218.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679213A67AD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:07:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so329046bwz.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:07:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mTObRw/cMkbhKtUlmIbJUrT4DzmvVD6LEpP9T874bqg=; b=Gb69p2a3YsDe0rz0prG/kAIYFxIbpmpp/CZTa0OSd9aMwT+2fI0l3dfvm83jMKz0p6 pOJRRX7pffevICVV52ZM0D2m+9lzsHBr6LCqypB6e95jrZ7YyLVJFI0ntBTPSAZTBSWT 7Fbnrprq2g5Bq+6hrhLkce2lXPxx9slg4XwZ0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=m7RhmhkGzLBp44XinXNVt/S3pEGAa4KWY7YxPOfqmuJVar5BCd+uhpE16jthhF0CPV NQUoNg5zVa5ukTMoErnNAn99fvlzFfwnflyh3K+rNsnwHf4PJdPAdvUC+aEfV8RNPjTU 0IMp7by9WAp5M02cwU4BchMlsI2MekKCPmgUM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.181.145.7 with SMTP id x7mr332611bkn.177.1234994868921; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:07:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6846CCF9-0C56-4EBD-8FCE-76B31DA17370@cisco.com>
References: <20090213190630.56CF76BE54F@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <2963ECA56B01F94B9964469DCB8A2B5A05610EF6@de01exm69.ds.mot.com> <265AEFC9577741F5A6B36FACDD757673@LROSENTOSHIBA> <499965B7.9050702@alvestrand.no> <3BEE4CFFA90F43B5917F328AE8BDF0EE@LROSENTOSHIBA> <p06240839c5bfa3544666@10.20.30.158> <F4E3B51C33F640CDBBCF1C317EDF6817@LROSENTOSHIBA> <p06240856c5bfbe3793c2@10.20.30.158> <877585b00902170714v455313dpb5f0982d5a13eaf2@mail.gmail.com> <6846CCF9-0C56-4EBD-8FCE-76B31DA17370@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:07:48 +0000
Message-ID: <877585b00902181407t5b5f3bd3u21b0ed7f9fd2b601@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
From: Michael Dillon <wavetossed@googlemail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:07:39 -0000
> FSF is very well intentioned; don't understand me to say otherwise. That > said, I think their view on IPR is pretty extreme - "no IPR is acceptable". Perhaps that is their view as an organization, but if the IETF engages with the FSF to get individuals involved in the IPR discussions, I think you will find more flexibility of viewpoint. If the IETF chooses to ignore the FSF, I don't think that strategy will work.
- RE: References to Redphone's "patent" Noel Chiappa
- Re: References to Redphone's "patent" Thomas Narten
- RE: References to Redphone's "patent" Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- Re: References to Redphone's "patent" Scott Brim
- RE: References to Redphone's "patent" Lawrence Rosen
- RE: References to Redphone's "patent" Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: References to Redphone's "patent" Noel Chiappa
- RE: References to Redphone's "patent" Contreras, Jorge
- IPR advice to avoid ignorant flame wars about pat… Lawrence Rosen
- Previous consensus on not changing patent policy … Harald Alvestrand
- RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent pol… Lawrence Rosen
- Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent pol… John Levine
- RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent pol… Paul Hoffman
- Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent pol… ned+ietf
- Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board Lawrence Rosen
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board Paul Hoffman
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board Michael Dillon
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board Paul Hoffman
- Settlement proposal - Re: Previous consensus on n… TSG
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board Thierry Moreau
- RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board Michael B. Einschlag
- Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent pol… TSG
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board John Levine
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board Doug Ewell
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board Michael Dillon
- RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent pol… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent pol… Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board John Levine
- RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent pol… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board TSG
- Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent pol… Theodore Tso