IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-resnick-variance-00.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 28 March 2020 00:52 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF41F3A0D34 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yTOj8s5vVg2S for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66CE83A0D19 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id d17so5466055pgo.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8KIYbfSNmfs6BusZfA6L4GZMJZ3w36cCkP/JwWvxeaA=; b=pqCJV5gaG4tmwIDMGyEfNPwMSCAW8KVU4pCqsiwMneH4qEADDsh9p9yKSs2qlw3ZtQ /Eh8SBUANISoEbIINsAsvlnyMnu1eYSVbyv+O21QF7l4ywt57yS33EsCBlsZjZYUYk3d 5UrvLXEO+Vp4OKWYiOmkeY+46zXyTKKZU7myfzrVjik3+qR4jFFb1/T8ITY6OnMYEBPK JmdeQJB3jIHpY1RTIAYAgUstSgB5NePJB+tsQWBDHvEL2thhtiLhPJFmTdpFmNuTurCx UNKHbIyjfuRC1fuR29WUlhzn5Yoiax5M+39UVP9oGbqu/nJjKTWiPrBdO4s4U3qmzyLo w+SQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8KIYbfSNmfs6BusZfA6L4GZMJZ3w36cCkP/JwWvxeaA=; b=aG7pDAkoaKHmfbYOQGx/2wTZ0RAkexeNeIWfizaJVWe5T53LfvUxbVnkQW1Nw4zJeA 5VMIzL9jqzeltLXsrs5CZ7cRrFF/i90pq84iFMpQag3CQ12COr6Z6Qmgru+586LrVLKC uXqqSYh2YCzF0LV4bF7TM4uVqlBimVVHJC0EG4wETSg8HlkIcDNq2DXuB+hMKcy0vx6+ 7paHV/DY1KDtDugqBQNN2h9eJ6vI/2cbE+ycYISmMj6b8vmirm4DAJDym1+lHIvIS1YB iMd24q+P/HHkz3lcQ1DwQd+ccog9OlDLKigLLw0rEw2Ru1V8r6jzPNsrOcBwKom+cUHx Zlhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1Zmk06tTIIgVDLVAbfw9k26hRcgG28cNabCDFtKCJzGhzSEI4D D6/yl4+1IodG4zaH4SJrcJdKmmlD
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsLZk/l+28nCWDBx/ZaWiwAEvaMlwKY8oI0T1Ti3YIUpyUZXICoYpT5TGjRFVxXr+EXD/w/GA==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:5a0e:: with SMTP id y14mr1995346pgs.90.1585356736532; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.25.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w5sm5048536pfq.80.2020.03.27.17.52.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-resnick-variance-00.txt
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <158533925458.17797.13806166303625482245@ietfa.amsl.com> <AE66200A-E718-4BF6-BA87-EE427A0BF971@episteme.net> <0e9e0a5f-5022-9a06-b8be-46d922f31aa7@nostrum.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ab6d0cc7-b6b9-7eb0-8ce0-0c4f8165618d@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 13:52:11 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0e9e0a5f-5022-9a06-b8be-46d922f31aa7@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UdoGvur19OwDVM74Kqn1IKHBr8w>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 00:52:19 -0000

On 28-Mar-20 11:50, Adam Roach wrote:
> On 3/27/2020 3:02 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>> When I posted my suggestion for the short-term fix for the 2020-2021 
>> NomCom, I mentioned that we would have to publish it as a BCP.
> 
> 
> I'm not sure that's 100% correct. See, e.g., 
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/nomcom-eligibility-day-passes/

Yes. For the present emergency situation, I think that an IETF statement *notified to the ISOC Board* is necessary and sufficient. Notifying the ISOC Board is essential simply because they are the end of the appeals chain.

Pete's draft is not objectionable to me but I don't think it's necessary.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email