Re: IETF 108 will be an online meeting

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 15 May 2020 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FBC3A0876 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2020 12:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78kAPtiRWGM7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2020 12:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 147493A086E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2020 12:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id n15so1438183pjt.4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2020 12:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version; bh=eMUw/xLVeiUl5lqTYAsUfjwBSrQoX8Iv88KrvXydhqg=; b=PKYf/8YkZzU0b8Pw8S5dgix51ZtcUxL8rDGZlX9hx+/LHtxnhGCaR1eWVhWTtkBi0y TfxpONTKh5tNAKGjyLBpxnG0OzQ8ATMIRrxOa083BxcX6gkZexfgq94ODkru7Nv5UIIl ozsNSs5eN6IShnRqx6JddgYK1VnWA+G+2xZVmJB70Zqcg1MGu7aD/Qeco56FzMy2Ecw4 SUb/FfqgPvU795XuJbvlg+WRZIB5jyA0fp3YRPzsd6TjC4wpS1lkeK6+QDYPQxazoJZF 6bkJrO8jZQdjLid7cGmKp3quWGCLiSPtX18U6fapaY23TRWgS5Rp1EeuzZybw/ziYv2R NKdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version; bh=eMUw/xLVeiUl5lqTYAsUfjwBSrQoX8Iv88KrvXydhqg=; b=HjfoaWu9gq8isr+rX5fw59LVopz+jqlrjQotcBEbkwmaqze+3O/q1ufVaWbWSA8mss /viGxe98Ldh/Ldu1415W5DsdPXDpWEP4xpTm9nRABfCP3fFNjcaFv2dYxyhPnVLVmZsx 6zYFdquB3l8YTqz4PlwEWZ0rjz7vVkSc6X27yhV5hHyi6tm06IbN05lU8Akf0jRpEzHK gILzEkOUUrMtyQKm+921oR5GAOlk4nIHOC/re+LsyI1uClOZd9lV0oSjoAtlY//v4Xoi 7kDGxZ/tI6+NojjOJht+V0UQS+Zw2vGR2hr3Y95s8B4nFoOioW/RgvSyZJ3trC2eSuyO G9Vw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532giHLsQpG+5lEdSrIebrH8gqsP1NjC23IX5J4g9Uucr5tn1zXK k14UlCC8IOqeXaoCcb/O+V8SKx/m
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzbvgMaR9dt1kmauZ4xzR6/1ea75nTMaEsElX0oJl4//WPSOTVD2YgvlI2y8aOMXbvYn6XWLA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ea8b:: with SMTP id x11mr5023603plb.205.1589571525956; Fri, 15 May 2020 12:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (c-73-63-232-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.63.232.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n2sm1893352pfe.161.2020.05.15.12.38.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 May 2020 12:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 12:38:35 -0700
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>, Juan Carlos Zuniga <j.c.zuniga@ieee.org>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, Juan Carlos Zuniga <juancarlos.zuniga@sigfox.com>
Message-ID: <f6ea9c80-9d7b-4226-9ac5-4df29bb24548@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <CAHLBt81RVt+9PiMB=HqFDB2fL5W7+a6nT3vzsqY3PapwZOko=Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <83D4CBCE-E464-4CCC-8679-592531EF7448@ietf.org> <982E1F5E-83C0-4EE7-8826-67C872893F6E@consulintel.es> <4956152a-6a6d-e993-592c-6c99e9415545@cs.tcd.ie> <CAHLBt81RVt+9PiMB=HqFDB2fL5W7+a6nT3vzsqY3PapwZOko=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF 108 will be an online meeting
X-Readdle-Message-ID: f6ea9c80-9d7b-4226-9ac5-4df29bb24548@Spark
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5ebeefc3_684eed59_658"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UfT8h37do4uv8NcRf-obr8mGU68>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 19:38:51 -0000

+1

Cheers,
Jeff
On May 15, 2020, 12:06 PM -0700, Juan Carlos Zuniga <j.c.zuniga@ieee.org>, wrote:
> Indeed Jordi, the work that has been done for Madrid will not be wasted.
>
> I look forward to seeing you and all of the IETF colleagues in the near future!
>
> Juan Carlos
>
> > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 6:36 PM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hiya,
> > >
> > > On 14/05/2020 22:40, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > this was a very sad decision from my side
> > > > (many of you know that it took 20 years for me and lot of persistent
> > > > effort, to get IETF108 in Madrid!),
> > > My sympathies! Even if I didn't like Madrid (I do), I would
> > > now, for this reason alone, be keen for us to have an IETF
> > > meeting in Madrid as soon as we can. Fairness is fine
> > > in more than the transport layer, and I think it'd only be
> > > fair for those of us who pick venues to recognise the years
> > > of effort upended by the cancellation. (Which is a good bit
> > > worse than Vancouver, us having met there a few times.)
> > >
> > > Cheers and hoping we all meet soon,
> > > S.