Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Wed, 02 November 2016 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBA8129579 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3oG3Wfhm3RcG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x231.google.com (mail-pf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 466601296FF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id n85so15576729pfi.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:to:references:cc:reply-to:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=l2lx8KRZDjAakXlQPHVKgaZrl12ggpn/1FcYwTRRFag=; b=cRaBLRew9lkPpaALofyw/g6B6rS7Yv0Gnus3U1vLkrnN8bDNn96c+fJn5wyft+YsHf WdMBfeJY05WgSjksvgldA71WjmM19v5RQSsSLTbCbfG4+UlxUy+c9AjMZ7hXvuOzzGbv rtsVf1bp6TULIRdrglaeBFlmBarKrNc5u2IDxxD+M8BjSZo2N8pIozFg9SHJm82vVyCp up/j02DMOI5RCpUUVas/f9e6U8uOblYSXKXLodPE269bPfjsoYifJQpaxO86JZkrsC7u FODAwtUEERjyljQkcdg5jhQ17+EMwdGkw95OJyznAMwT+l5vvTlas/4DJE2xSd/4sGXv JV+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:cc:reply-to :organization:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=l2lx8KRZDjAakXlQPHVKgaZrl12ggpn/1FcYwTRRFag=; b=HYGdAs5OrXtQ4y+pDJc5rED17zsXZzvtEvkd7FHgzv50hqk3XfE9giXGuy1FcU621I PQsUrhF3ijen1LBaOX8ShyvD4/AngeuQd4NyryOEps9q+nJ/Na3HWanY4ALEPmcKyTZf ML12pxGg4sFCCuQD5Z44VeCi1a+KH0cSIhMJufBE3JGn+57UnTUNuMrpT69P40oVbB0x FWcXCdqJotR4EcqRCqJQPhO/sI5+uEmasCWStXZX8NbPwKaKm03z5osSzTvwHGTfaBAI BNY3I7ppc11FGEV+aSKuF9DrXPDtfc4+vSjC8XAZPMJuJu/xwlFYK6lF7OZvl5WX0C35 wQjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdsT/xoC7yJ+GSbrtLpupmGdw+T3zrbhNJT+WticiIgD9ZAdVyRtraxYxfLh+hy3A==
X-Received: by 10.98.70.150 with SMTP id o22mr9038524pfi.134.1478108762723; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.71.12.45] ([8.25.222.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s8sm6269393pfj.45.2016.11.02.10.46.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <MHammer@ag.com>
References: <CAPt1N1k1wg9mbN-guuarFP0NvX7v-suOY-bP=TDEOCVhK-epmg@mail.gmail.com> <20161102165600.67029.qmail@ary.lan> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B0526789ED8@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <CAPt1N1=_jvrNbhxDyWXpJszUtqRZEEouRibwgWD1aY5wfhsX_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <8bf5cbea-bcbe-5e3b-37f9-dd37f76e7ecc@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:46:01 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1=_jvrNbhxDyWXpJszUtqRZEEouRibwgWD1aY5wfhsX_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UgsJx7fX1sZe6WJZt9AQggyB5lU>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 17:46:20 -0000

On 11/2/2016 10:27 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> There's a pretty clear ops problem here that could be solved by simply
> detecting addresses with DMARC and rewriting the From: headers on
> those messages.   This would eliminate all problems immediately.


While creating others.

Unless one considers the end-user import of From: field contents to be 
largely irrelevant.

As a small example, note that getting a copy of the message directly 
from the author, versus getting it through the mailing list, will 
display as being from separate authors.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net