Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 15 March 2016 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D209F12DA6B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A9snS_Ntw_Yk for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9BA612DA8D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8355F203AD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:06:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA5263755 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:04:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: IETF Disgust List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users
In-Reply-To: <4349AFDD-350C-4217-9BEE-3DBD2F608F95@nohats.ca>
References: <20160313143521.GC26841@Hirasawa> <m2a8m0y72q.wl%randy@psg.com> <F04B3B85-6B14-43BA-9A21-FC0A31E79065@piuha.net> <56E7E09D.7040100@cisco.com> <4349AFDD-350C-4217-9BEE-3DBD2F608F95@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:04:22 -0400
Message-ID: <27177.1458050662@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Uj6MWwbWF7DjaqClIeN4If0tQrk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:05:48 -0000

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
    > Because some users under scrutiny of some nation states deem they need
    > to use tor for their privacy and safety for all their browsing. It
    > would be extremely dangerous to continuously switch tor off and on.

Right...+1..

so it's not that some need to access *IETF* via Tor, but that by
always using Tor, their accesses to IETF are part of the chaff that protects
their wheat.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-