Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet standards
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 02 April 2020 20:21 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A311A3A15B8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LX9Ze8_c5NTp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4B03A173E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.10.93]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 032KKsaI000137 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1585858867; x=1585945267; i=@elandsys.com; bh=HojWfm/gz0OxJMXzS13whPmRtXTWHWXXyEa2zBGu3rk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=dW7IAAV+MWZne4bRyZATw8rKMuDw0wiikblVFVP3vJrwRtRmIoe6OjF/BSuwChXfp c7wpWMrngsYTFark0JfKRXlHkTvGYcEXNnGC02R3H4PJE95NHJSTsTFhIpwxhOkTwo OmEQtlyFedPY3/m9Ly78C3jOCKzAzVUNVDVfGTgI=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200402115400.0989b740@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 13:01:32 -0700
To: "Marcolla, Sara Veronica" <Sara.Marcolla@europol.europa.eu>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet standards
In-Reply-To: <68ab4f9e057d49b0972f97a907f45ced@elvas.europol.eu.int>
References: <68ab4f9e057d49b0972f97a907f45ced@elvas.europol.eu.int>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UpMaKEo2mXM9m4jXJOOHi614uIQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 20:21:27 -0000
Dear Sara, At 02:47 PM 27-03-2020, Marcolla, Sara Veronica wrote: >The issue is, when government representative participate to IETF (or >a RIR, or ICANN, or a NOG), they do so in their official capacity, >thus representing to some extent their organisation. They (we) do >understand the concept, however it is impossible to attend without >this sort of "official" hat. So on one hand there is Joe-as-himself, >and on the other hand there in Alice-as-a-whole-government-rep. How >do we make this work better for everyone's benefit in IETF? My email address could be read as being from someone working for company X. That could be someone who is working as a junior engineer or someone with an impressive job title. In general, the former does not have much leverage in the company. The latter might not understand SR-MPLS [1] or that the report which was attributed to the United Nations is not a report from that body. Should the question be about what works for everyone's benefit? In my opinion, it is easier to see whether the attendance in the IETF is worthwhile. Does your organisation gain a commercial or other benefit from that? I assume that someone within your organisation will be evaluating that if the organisation is paying for the expenses. There are employees of a government in North America who have participated in the IETF. I don't see why participating in an official capacity would cause a problem in this venue. Regards, S. Moonesamy 1. https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1677/
- @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet stand… Marcolla, Sara Veronica
- RE: United Nations report on Internet standards Brian E Carpenter
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… Keith Moore
- Re: United Nations report on Internet standards JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… John Levine
- Re: United Nations report on Internet standards Stephane Bortzmeyer
- @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet stand… Marcolla, Sara Veronica
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… Keith Moore
- @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet stand… Marcolla, Sara Veronica
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… Keith Moore
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… Stephen Farrell
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… Michael Richardson
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… tom petch
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [EXT] Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on … Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [EXT] Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on … John C Klensin
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… Fred Baker
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… S Moonesamy
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… Bron Gondwana
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… Keith Moore
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… Bron Gondwana
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… John Levine
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… Keith Moore
- Re: @EXT: RE: United Nations report on Internet s… Keith Moore