IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Qualifying for NomCom

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 07 April 2016 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC7612D667 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z9C4Bgen7poI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22c.google.com (mail-vk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D970812D52E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id c4so109890549vkb.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=l/Ts2imiNyaxJ0i8JUm+21iqSGPVT9aJLXmRHe3n/9M=; b=KWP2c2iUUxLroux0tOXoCQZHODpmHVldVFpI1BuCltvTecLX1CzNp9gib7hje1lqwY 4MtUAZ1f69A/l/WwTyX2v2gITrGSN0TJdLz7JxWKdb0pQByJ0IFs6lKkZRKsdD9G0r+K OpgI849Dnb0SPigF5w5JMgA+KiSffIgRyeSI1Qyg2TkYEg+CkJOLmSj2mGeMxLJtf0qQ 0B6Ta9/Z6zU60Z4Rg4tkTjmHZ6Gjvo/39bvalT53ynBPTEvxXtjeiY3CHWSUFxwhroEM ZHLJHmA/2WWwwYon2ohXYUgsSOpOyuLGd4D3k41YBSr/cwufjHaSYqQsPjG+iTZa34m4 os3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=l/Ts2imiNyaxJ0i8JUm+21iqSGPVT9aJLXmRHe3n/9M=; b=ImQEkegDzpCOQ7UwHO87d9k4oSYq1f3PMBrNWytbIfIc+HTdgvxzb4JJKlMXhUVAv0 6/Ua84fW9QhcDJmHS2fgHL8IkadgD12j0QQxgoOl2d+GviwJ/f1hCUwayGRNfJ47v+hN sFH+WQZWm2TimI5u4eEb03fmY+aAMvNpgI/UcWiWfhRp8epOYOuFb9wEfHc91BuqZsrP jegUq3fanl1NpenBkAU66FY83pV7ZrLGwm3MfWXNpORcgxdpSzVZOMF0koETGymx/TQm FM7U6ugBUDo/CFbCwsHNdQhE/o0EU8BoeKYsWAvfHUU2TKZC3pGLF9+J8RflZuvhzQ02 69Iw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJSSGKyWcwBmHjlDufKGp3EbX1kV4sa9JjabS+AKElAvDYg5U+NbxbNVMyiwS3SYK8u/1Glqxn+CEpoAA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.52.147 with SMTP id b141mr2131286vka.82.1460053077011; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.43.5 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1=SYpo-CiHoc07Ukb04Kb1LGV2=BPPyRLUsaqyLM9Hbwg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwY0FuDp5=RMFEhUMtkK=XNDxX2dogvVY7+OSy88jrrvOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=SYpo-CiHoc07Ukb04Kb1LGV2=BPPyRLUsaqyLM9Hbwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 15:17:56 -0300
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbhYRqw7fXHzYY0=W-CpmeHeDdaZx3z2Qg0cA2aMrmVwg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Qualifying for NomCom
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143f846023536052fe919f4"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UpsBrp6vEadVX9aTLxYmp6xDLZ8>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 18:18:01 -0000

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

> What do you mean by "coming to consensus?"
>

There was no clear agreement on a new set of qualifying criteria, and the
discussion faded out.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email