RE: [I2nsf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-11.txt> (I2NSF Problem Statement and Use cases) to Proposed Standard

["Susan Hares" <[e-mail]>]

Ed: 

 

Thank you for this comment.  I will make this change in version-12.   I’ll wait a few days to see if additional comments are provided during IETF LC. 

 

Sue 

 

From: NetNull [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 2:23 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: IETF-Announce; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-11.txt> (I2NSF Problem Statement and Use cases) to Proposed Standard

 

I endorse this draft, and appreciate citation from the original use-case draft.  However, note that my organization has changed from Fortinet to Curveball Networks

 

Ed Lopez - Curveball Networks

On March 8, 2017 at 1:40 PM, The IESG <[e-mail]> wrote:


The IESG has received a request from the Interface to Network Security 
Functions WG (i2nsf) to consider the following document: 
- 'I2NSF Problem Statement and Use cases' 
<draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-11.txt> as Proposed Standard 

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits 
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the 
[e-mail] mailing lists by 2017-03-22. Exceptionally, comments may be 
sent to [e-mail] instead. In either case, please retain the 
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. 

Abstract 


This document describes the problem statement for Interface to 
Network Security Functions (I2NSF) as well as some companion use 
cases. 




The file can be obtained via 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases/ 

IESG discussion can be tracked via 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases/ballot/ 


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. 




_______________________________________________ 
I2nsf mailing list 
[e-mail] 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf