IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Evolving Documents (nee "Living Documents") side meeting at IETF105.

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Wed, 03 July 2019 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9338012016C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ksGYTo2iBdj4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B943F120168 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id z23so3676594ote.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 13:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=naBuNTwlfAJ63aEWMv6Rb5twdZ6dWUZ7k0B+TxJN3MI=; b=KcGe1apeCoXHq/oBP9emUpeD32qAaEPCQ2PQ8rrh6LG/TiT+HVj8k6LBzPzndlI/Bw 9Q1Y2/ngtLqbXpImfmTaKBM5cBL92EOtxL4+8yIwBNtqCcLBg40rqYAjqu93phBCebAg KYA07Of7UQtOZ4A0v3+7D8A6q5eAVSGTP9Rz30cTV0lBZOFS09RkCOU+5ARK+2UJ/SAc CrVyRmCEPhGQx6DeVx816PuMMnilRMrXBymmZzeEKVEQJdXQQ4KNcQLCnP5gV7CaEYvM wky5wSatJwnuquC6wggiywjts9AiqxB5BKggQApOdK7OD3UXbuR+kEgUKRczkOpgJjGL ZkFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=naBuNTwlfAJ63aEWMv6Rb5twdZ6dWUZ7k0B+TxJN3MI=; b=tY5o8ObCyDMUO58fOrNuczm7G5zxOMYjEDflw2aXaa21ECrnL+CpVfL9+SeSmQvjU3 XWiRVd9ZYRxuzHHtWzMoqP/OUNlbN+sD6Lwgx0SRNHeJxT2VauT8QuL0grgXlI8VBtRV LfPuz3oSMMBNR3yuPhpbXvEAi2/hMv3bOp+RGC3QDYYpqp/55+MBOCZr6f30CapWQb1n hjUpB07PclfUTNAOgapGrTJrR2NEL9+cNaX/zP6w84rYnpqANcm4M338hKovF/wQc/Xz zVFZGY0AOSfSTBlYFb8W4ZXjrOMmUA+zOJVXp/Df5y1S5QVHJqH+Ef/RovfPSKGoV5Vd 2AJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVCwjTi7uAsgn5VZau1DKrNCm3KjRU+Efhhp2HRzxak9JHqLEk8 W3wUWVW360e193InwVZ40Mjj/tledgweZA4Ce6vsxxNBNJs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz9fux9kAF2C96ni3Ut0pEzUMjtNEBFy8lkFlo6i/fs9OIGp/37GEUyPPhq1NctrCO1i9Jg0+LmuiXBV4mbkR8=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5788:: with SMTP id q8mr29527106oth.237.1562184965955; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 13:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHw9_iKv7xDY-rT98F_BAEvGOGbWGL7UpXS42rSVLsHB+=SOZg@mail.gmail.com> <4567879e-aa29-aeae-72e9-33d148d30eed@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <4567879e-aa29-aeae-72e9-33d148d30eed@network-heretics.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 16:15:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgToQWmOrfOxS_dc4KRtT9e0PXNzmhWZHkRUyV_3V=E-mQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Evolving Documents (nee "Living Documents") side meeting at IETF105.
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f8368a058ccc877d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UwCMAEP_qaJdNteoJRFkzfcEjzE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 20:16:09 -0000

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 4:10 PM Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
wrote:

> On 7/3/19 4:04 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> > Hi there all,
> >
> > TL;DR: Being able to mark a specific version of an *Internet Draft* as
> > “stable” would often be useful. By encoding information in the name
> > (stable-foo-bar-00) we can do this.
> >
> > Heather and I will be holding a side meeting at IETF 105 to discuss
> > the idea and get feedback.
> > When: Tue, July 23, 3:00pm – 4:30pm
> > Where: C2 (21st Floor)
>
> It seems to me that this would defeat the entire purpose of
> Internet-Drafts and serve to circumvent the IETF process.    There
> should be no expectation of stability until a document has reached
> IETF-wide consensus.
>

Why is it necessary to conjoin those two things?

--Richard

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email