Re: [79all] IETF Badge

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 11 November 2010 10:12 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164FB3A6905; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:12:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.557
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ndTzsKMq1B1L; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:12:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E318E3A68E5; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:12:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-710a.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-710a.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.113.10]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCA9A40BB9; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 03:22:18 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4CDBC1A1.7020500@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:12:49 +0800
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [79all] IETF Badge
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011090344110.46514@fledge.watson.org> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011110103450.3692@pita.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011110103450.3692@pita.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms010307050102000306090709"
Cc: iaoc@ietf.org, Samuel Weiler <weiler+ietf@watson.org>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:12:32 -0000

On 11/11/10 5:25 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:

> The "action" you are talking about came in the form of an announcement 
> about local logistics. I cannot tell you at this stage if this was a 
> hotel requirement, a host requirement (as part of their government 
> approval to host this meeting) or a combination of both. In any case, 
> I consider it a /minor/ annoyance if I happen leave my badge behind 
> (happened to me once yesterday), and not something that would require 
> IAOC policy discussions, community input, etc, etc. 

Being required to carry one's badge is indeed a minor issue. Allowing
the local host to dictate how we run our meetings is a major issue.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/