Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 19 January 2015 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C3A1B2C0A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:35:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dwsmj-umBJNR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:35:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com (mail-lb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A4951B2B84 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:35:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id z12so9258378lbi.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:35:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZC+cZcPU/K18G2I7FKtl6dEbQ/aQFtxm1fnbGryQY+s=; b=LRWmIW+Mv0mI6+GHJUSYi3mzY4E6SwIj3artTvL3r5owhfwMk6Bd4nKoNp/hENB8Ee al32S3YkLYOrmUaIWLAgtVoJoyOxvrXY2AnhLGfReEXjpnQwDIz7wuiH3BIBSipvMsFQ gn7gSZTQXi0lVcjR20DJ1hv8exTBI2gV7ZQ2PTUClLwO1O12XQFv9tXNRNPQ7WlU45sQ TAQiliwQxefE04k55QOB9eQb2M4AOG+dgd8lU72dql+cFKk8SXOWvkg7Uv0eW3Z8kl3t RLOPishrz/LfXL2Jpp9jT2TQIkxAc3x/0i29uiP3dnN8YBc+UFakZrVNLxZrSB/vrAbg GwXA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.162.4 with SMTP id xw4mr33348607lbb.89.1421696112859; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.145.102 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:35:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR0201MB0960F339E10E51FD0153DDF4C34A0@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <ED473823-2B1E-4431-8B42-393D20BA72DF@piuha.net> <54AC505B.8090802@nostrum.com> <8EFCB6B4-0D95-459E-A316-DB29C3945A33@cooperw.in> <DM2PR0201MB09604D5A8DBF0D315E6DA7BAC34A0@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <33740FEA-AEA1-4933-A17C-50B92C7619F0@gmail.com> <DM2PR0201MB0960F339E10E51FD0153DDF4C34A0@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:35:12 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH5SONtcY2ENQ8rdqqYJ01YVFFU+1+UR9W3R++eYxmGhjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/V43QTVlHNj2r-XeOf467fMv0_AU>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:35:16 -0000

Hi Larry,

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote:
>> What you are suggesting here is a mini-area with
>> around 5 working groups. Doesn’t this make it worse?
>
> Of current working groups I'd count 9.5, not 5,
> Appsawg .5, Httpbis, Hybi, Json, Urn, Websec, Rtcweb, Webpush, Jose, Oauth

JOSE is in Sec right now and is very close to being done, I hope
before Dallas and if not, soon after.  Oauth is in Sec too right now
and has more work to finish.

Kathleen

>
> And perhaps some of OPS work, too.
>
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen