Re: Jim: Re: [rfc-i] FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? (was: Re: John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences)

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 29 October 2020 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A7F3A0B41 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.142
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.142 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a9oULdjAOT11 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74CB73A0B08 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839105C011A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:22:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:22:57 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=tdBjdR LH9zB43Ioens7V5d7Xj/Q9FKeySYphy6PhpkA=; b=F4cxpTVZJKzAlfwBsZaBYe +nWsmMSPzJ5YX/BY4/zoy0YRXLe56ukp8aXgUeiDxSxxSAZwCg0HdHEzCq76yl9N E/g5jIM0v9YEdd/ac3gQDDDd7dSZ6NLS54Db2R/B5qz3ysOFikgLDbX94DgtN2Y4 J4dWXOKXunuud/Wybl2nFj3sE+LnRItMA08f5hRQTkyh4nz1dHQfQ8vFwA9+k17R wLJ+BZowC8NFXkJmW8cUzubuesNQnTizJKri0tF1/RSA2bsfJ7wcGq/fPMYqPfiB 6OOjUtpLvttxWB+3n93gfgcfAB2Zh+Svbrol8jPN3RqSSupLKBpJuACkcJOmD4Nw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:cfqaX1Oc8vdGS7YyVSM-fBwu2GHS78Ridz6S2UV7AocZuJjEmS9eKg> <xme:cfqaX389Oelx7R3_dABU93578_KkqU9vSIYh1gDZOi3-O3fMPq-pSpvsL6JccajhF v7lZbSTQAVMUQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrleefgdellecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtsegrtderre dtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhr khdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeduteefkeevveefle dtkeffieegleekgfduveegtddvheejgffggfelhfdvueduieenucffohhmrghinhepihgv thhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedutdekrddvvddurddukedtrdduheenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhk qdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:cfqaX0ShE4WLTYLIjYHDxPaZM_xKec63tgcGa7qc1n0318WqjRUQmQ> <xmx:cfqaXxsu0jM7XkqHQegAm_8eel7jKd1QCjbDcewM22FvS5JWaVkjMg> <xmx:cfqaX9enEQ2cq9EWeQVQ-KknTHbs7nhI5X9kVSFoMQdGXeogGKdXSg> <xmx:cfqaX4-_4fSm2XnTDbIIbnSVKbN1fey-LBGWm-eA5bnBGQIEQs9wrw>
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DD74E3064680 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:22:56 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Jim: Re: [rfc-i] FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? (was: Re: John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences)
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20201026181442.GA2438@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAMm+LwiVmE=qtSPCMD-3foPODL8bgETj3dQDKS-3BOM2021dEg@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jdSeTDWy_0fCV25ykxKFMV1ZBtUMMNesoOuaXCzFVfpOA@mail.gmail.com> <D2D0455D-8D6C-4A19-ACAE-4DD972D83DC1@bluepopcorn.net> <20201028164053.GB12700@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <263C265C19B24BA97AF48934@PSB> <225062D7-C061-4543-8665-53A4F4831510@isc.org> <20201029005519.GT39170@kduck.mit.edu> <A05242FC-C38C-474F-A2AC-412329CA5C52@isc.org> <47fae06e-7c21-ec12-d6de-903fee3f3ad4@gmx.de> <cbf43e3f-05a3-368b-21dd-d15001326094@network-heretics.com> <7075dcf2-f612-ca17-4538-65e92e5215c9@gmx.de> <c6f12b28-6a24-3368-72f6-b9a74bd7cddf@network-heretics.com> <55acc78d-ae69-5117-dab1-205c8331c363@gmx.de>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <79a1420c-3c45-d595-9c20-9ea8236a0620@network-heretics.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:22:55 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55acc78d-ae69-5117-dab1-205c8331c363@gmx.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------F12FFA957715BD0269B14C4C"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/V5s4_2K1JjM4myUb0K-FXKIpjwg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:23:00 -0000

On 10/29/20 1:14 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

>> But then you actually have to install xml2rfc and keep it up to date. I
>> tried that once but gave up because it was such a hassle. ls
>
> "pip install --upgrade ..." (update?) has worked for me for years. 

Is this documented anywhere prominently?   I see no mention of this on:

  * https://ietf.org/standards/ids/
  * https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/
  * https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/xml2rfcFAQ.html

How many places should someone have to look to find this?  It's not as 
if "pip" is the obvious place to look, especially to someone who doesn't 
use python regularly.   And even if one finds some version of this tool 
somewhere, how is one to know which is the current version?