IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 15 December 2009 11:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016AB3A683B for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:12:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mn3rKmMDT51f for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:12:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BD23A69EC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:12:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03ECBD4948; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:11:58 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BDZdxTIxWVgk; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:11:57 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E8DD491C; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:11:57 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4B276EFC.9090302@piuha.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:11:56 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steven Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
References: <4B1E5330.4060805@htt-consult.com> <4B1E870C.6090407@dcrocker.net><9312343DC03A44A5B764F74DEBBC9761@DGBP7M81><3f4922c70912140712n12bd843cu4b3a2ca2da5b009@mail.gmail.com> <6AA9B7DC-A37D-47A6-BD33-797E8BD89A6D@bbn.com> <008701ca7d1b$06e461e0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <1bf4d1160e04fb874e6be0c7daeca1b9.squirrel@pi.nu> <B66D1543-BB3C-49FE-BBCD-A442A6B0B929@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <B66D1543-BB3C-49FE-BBCD-A442A6B0B929@cs.columbia.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:12:13 -0000

Steven,

> Are you expecting people to reply with +I?

Some of us have already transitioned to the new numbering system. This 
document is currently in last call:

   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xli-behave-ivi-05

and I quote:

   This document presents the CERNET IVI translation design and
   deployment for the IPv4/IPv6 coexistence and transition.  In roman
   numerals, the IV stands for 4 and VI stands for 6, so IVI stands for
   the IPv4/IPv6 translation.

Jari

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status