Re: Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 05 May 2016 02:05 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9618C12B074; Wed, 4 May 2016 19:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N_g5-kiabKDY; Wed, 4 May 2016 19:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x229.google.com (mail-io0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D31112D121; Wed, 4 May 2016 19:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x229.google.com with SMTP id d62so72412600iof.2; Wed, 04 May 2016 19:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=W4TaI7eRqIDreGlI4ypJl0XknGLwbAqrcu2ZMG2cdog=; b=p1g9aSvj8nvMMzJHsEyuG6HjJFDM7J6kyrfrNVU+r4HVlDcbJYZ6kcLzTuW7863D1c vtLlGVXTT4XV3jiLnlAAp4FjRmOf3iZxRojV3+iVW21vkvuN3WUQbg4MkIE9EQIszxLZ kRSI8hIO6evpmn/nvNDQgpm+sJY9qRkwJjyQqojhxOu1BhoelyiYDag1Zbc2k/+1cHyg RvtaqXCxg9/gkePdo4c0jBiCUJaNKo/t8daDzyr0YgxC8jK7MTGpe3uZMrhMTLBls9bW Twgs7HSSBczPVV6FjP4M78ucKIbSa+UsQDb7TMtZWR/gIdEyfVVnyaodOwEUDVTPEDbS RhJw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=W4TaI7eRqIDreGlI4ypJl0XknGLwbAqrcu2ZMG2cdog=; b=G0ERoSOg91jwlyThctDKZbWwIQFuaZI6OrhU25wtu61QFEw1xBrfckpHTdPqLuRsva Dd9RmeCZMxTUkKKdlj2Tnws6OWOtiE+miYMX5sKGVDUMYfym+aIZu+AG2UOv3BA85EmM vgWWJe2ENnd4xawBixEjpgjml+uZ+SZ6OqYg8d/18TQsvVutIqHqmAWsNTgexxr16rO8 ueFDOcnipK/HXiUyeUIZBjxEwIhu6WW3xZNh9mZpgyKIeg2xJ1EmvwVUp6pm/othzMF8 MF4Rlizg0+7vlcNQwawgca2yXIPDMgfNFLXWiB4smTM3qojLHlSorz+G9GLgFpf2XXwC PoPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWQgqsO7qbe7YoXl9I1Hjd41ZIIdmstZwsskDiSP3zu4NjLi54gWFvFdFRUf4ScijO1YOKvSYv6uldU5A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.136.76 with SMTP id k73mr15037705iod.100.1462413920242; Wed, 04 May 2016 19:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.43.82 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2016 19:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D8017772-5403-4C20-B69A-D6BB841A26E2@vigilsec.com>
References: <D8017772-5403-4C20-B69A-D6BB841A26E2@vigilsec.com>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 12:05:20 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUKhjXDFbUuKYtWrAAbyj3_1hbxMq7qTtpTZiC+Bzi76Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VDnLyeAseQwmlT8NUDgoS_lyomM>
Cc: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn.all@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 02:05:28 -0000

Hi Russ, sorry for missing this.  I have a pull request open against
my spec with the changes I've made.

https://github.com/martinthomson/drafts/pull/31

On 19 April 2016 at 05:35, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> Minor Concerns:
>
> I think it would really help
> the reader to say at the beginning something like: "The confidentiality
> protections ensure that media is protected from other applications, but
> the confidentiality protections do not extend to traffic on the data
> channels."

Yes, this is a good change.  I have adopted it.

> I understand why authentication and confidentiality are often used
> together.  However, it is very unclear to me why there ought to be a
> linkage between c-webrtc and authentication since this service really
> is only a promise to not share media with other applications.

I've trimmed down the text on authentication.  You are right that it
basically doesn't matter here.

> After reading the whole document, I went back and read the Abstract
> again.  I do not think it captures the real intent of the document.

I've taken a variation on your text.  I think that it's a better framing.