IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] New RFCs text formatting

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 01 December 2019 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD23A120072 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 09:52:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RPwhzM2EOBK0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 09:52:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 113A112004E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 09:52:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A43224E6; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 12:52:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:52:14 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Bvu3nUXOLNIrYZzeIBiQx98Hl+Wgmyy8den1prs04 Eo=; b=G+8PdxBMd03VrdKN94beMwAHJSueCC/eYRUJm1iAWSOAqQPhX3qeNLT1x /LazntbSuKdrbtU9zucYHv0NlvGa79EkWLM4wpxNsnuhlRESCf0WCvBQTefbQFbr 8ZK2qu3PYAjDrk7GgKdBMZSSN6iZolkdx4Ub1jomy27QUCqstklT+7edzlL405n8 lPEYUYR3S4+lg0KEnN5XI1zulXNfP0VmK1Gp7RyXJVSoxkwmMiG+zv+ARgbu19wx 7EG8RP5re8BEWlFCL3k3nS/Tx/Y8U3+AoXckXoBkBZFNAiL5v9qZG+oa/M0kjerq BUhQXGbdTgH9aPfgKdahTD9guF5GA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:y_3jXX0wfZWyM1QOVNTOhihr61erRcQtofsUWO3Cp3_xbjOufPdZkg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudejfedguddtkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpegtgfgguffhjgffkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghi thhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtoh hmqeenucfkphepleelrddvtdefrdefvddruddvtdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhho mhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:y_3jXe2JlxewVz5CfVN3YBevx23ynidJt5mnr7bK0pb97h6lV_CZTg> <xmx:y_3jXdWoN00dEnzvcXGrLTOoGueu6tGUuNXG6pJ_lM2Bzuw2M4tj8g> <xmx:y_3jXQjJplgK7Mietbdoh6pB9daUafukGfRySvRJcf3ZwBhROosmFg> <xmx:zv3jXWuSfHin2rlyeNDjU0QO1Y8kjpgyKLKpTeaMwdi-5qdIqNcNZw>
Received: from [28.115.192.35] (ip-99-203-32-120.pools.cgn.spcsdns.net [99.203.32.120]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 99AC780059; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 12:52:11 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [art] New RFCs text formatting
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <86428447-b3d5-92b0-b404-2b94a5915385@foobar.org>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:52:10 -0500
Cc: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Message-Id: <6EA0235C-BC0F-466D-8222-9F1C557421E1@network-heretics.com>
References: <86428447-b3d5-92b0-b404-2b94a5915385@foobar.org>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A860)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VHIHWuuNfOAoClhTCL1fg2TCO1Q>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 17:52:18 -0000


Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 1, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> 
> I'd be happy for pagination to be the default if there were rough consensus that the primary medium for reading RFCs was printed paper.

Seems like this is backwards.  Pagination should be removed from plain text RFCs only if there’s rough consensus that nobody prints RFCs anymore - not because a few individuals think that nobody should do that, or think that they’re in a position to dictate how RFCs are used. 

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email