Re: [IAOC] Badges and blue sheets

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[e-mail]>]

Hi Henk,

I don't agree. If there is people "essential" to the meeting but can't pay,
as we all pay for that, we have the right to know.

This is an open organization right ? I will be VERY concerned if we don't
have this information being made public immediately. It sounds really really
strange to me.

Is it documented in any RFC ?

Moreover, if I'm in between jobs, or need a new job, or whatever, I think is
good for me that others know, in case I can get some new offers.

Regards,
Jordi




> From: Henk Uijterwaal <[e-mail]>
> Organization: RIPE NCC
> Reply-To: <[e-mail]>
> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 03:19:46 +0100
> To: <[e-mail]>
> Cc: <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [IAOC] Badges and blue sheets
> 
> Hi Jordi,
> 
>> Yes, not an issue for me, and I think is right to provide complementary
>> tickets to voluntaries, HOST, NOC and future host. May be I'm omitting some.
> 
> Yes. There is the exceptional case of people who are considered essential
> for the meeting but who cannot pay to attend (say, they are between jobs),
> get a complementary ticket.  This is (IIRC) decided by the IETF chair.
> 
> I don't think we want to explicitly announce out who got such a ticket.
> 
>> What I think needs to be made clear is that the attendees list makes a
>> distinction in between those categories and (if that's the case) others
>> which are "real" complementary.
> 
> The attendee list already has comp-host and comp.  And if you care, then
> it is easy to put the comp people against the list of volunteers shown
> in the plenary.
> 
>>>> Why I'm asking this is that observing the 15$ increase in the cost of IETF,
>>>> vs. the number of "comp" folks (across certain number of meetings), we
>>>> could
>>>> have saved that attendance cost increase.
> 
> The costs of the IETF are split between the attendees (through the meeting
> fees) and ISOC.  The increase in meeting fee (by about 2.5%) was triggered
> by the observation that all the IETF costs would go up by a few % in 2011,
> and we thought it was reasonable to split the increase over the attendees
> and ISOC, rather than only ask ISOC for more money.
> 
> Henk
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net
> RIPE Network Coordination Centre          http://www.xs4all.nl/~henku
> P.O.Box 10096          Singel 258         Phone: [phone]
> 1001 EB Amsterdam      1016 AB Amsterdam  Fax: [phone]
> The Netherlands        The Netherlands    Mobile: [phone]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I confirm today what I denied yesterday.            Anonymous Politician.



**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.