Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard

[Hesham Soliman <[e-mail]>]

On 11/09/10 12:34 AM, "Alexandru Petrescu" <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Le 10/09/2010 14:12, Hesham Soliman a écrit :
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> When it is away from home it is fully a Host on the egress
>>> interface. When at home fully Router on same.  I am happy with it
>>> this way.
>>> 
>> 
>> =>  Ok that doesn't make any sense to me.
> 
> Well, let me rephrase as the RFC text puts it: when the MR is at home it
> joins the all-routers multicast address, otherwise it joins the
> all-hosts address.  ND spec says similar.  Similarly, when MR at home it
> can send RAs on the egress, if away it MUST NOT send RAs on it.  It must
> always send RAs on the ingress.  This is to make sure MR doesn't break
> the Internet routing.
> 
> Does this sound better?

=> I thought we were discussing the specific issue of how to solve this
problem in _this_WG_ as I mentioned in my first email. I know what the RFC
says and I wouldn't have done it this way but given this, I don't know how
else you can solve it _here_.

Hesham