IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Please Review Draft IESG Statement on Activities that are OBE

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 03 February 2009 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983B028C164; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:44:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7350328C19D for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:44:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z0VLABq53B77 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:44:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8635628C164 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:44:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.piuha.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E18E19876F; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:43:54 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by smtp.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E8519872A; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:43:54 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <49887402.8000007@piuha.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:42:42 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Please Review Draft IESG Statement on Activities that are OBE
References: <20090202004852.583463A690A@core3.amsl.com> <4987A564.90504@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4987A564.90504@gmail.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Brian,

> Almost, because I'm not sure that the "MUST NOT publish" should
> apply to Experimental. I think SHOULD NOT is strong enough for
> Experimental; we already have a set of guidelines for Experimental
> publication.
>   

I think I agree with this.

Jari

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status