IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code...

Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org> Mon, 03 December 2012 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <petithug@acm.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B52921F8593 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:41:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RlAVGhQwRWK8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:41:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [IPv6:2604:3400:dc1:41:216:3eff:fe5b:8240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD1321F854C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:41:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:9:4b80:32:fca2:179c:bd27:c87e] (unknown [IPv6:2601:9:4b80:32:fca2:179c:bd27:c87e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Marc Petit-Huguenin", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE1C20193; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 16:41:24 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <50BCD637.3030009@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:41:27 -0800
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121122 Icedove/10.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code...
References: <50BA64AB.3010106@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <50BA64AB.3010106@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF-Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 16:41:27 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 12/01/2012 12:12 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I've just posted an idea [1] for a small process improvement. If it doesn't
> seem crazy I'll try pursue it with the IESG as an RFC 3933 process
> experiment. If its universally hated then that's fine, it can die.
> 
> The IESG have seen (more-or-less) this already but it hasn't be discussed,
> so this is just a proposal from me and has no "official" status
> whatsoever.
> 
> Any comments, suggestions or better ideas are very welcome. Feel free to
> send me comments off list for now, or on this list I guess. If there's
> loads of email (always possible, this being a process thing;-) we can move
> to some other list.
> 
> Regards, Stephen.
> 
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-farrell-ft
> 

I support this idea, but I think that free software should also be considered
as part of this experiment (free software and open source are not synonymous).
 Using the acronym FOSS and defining it as Free or Open Source Software in the
document would achieve this.

Thanks.

- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=zieq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.16.0 | Report a Bug | By Email