IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 23 February 2017 00:50 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0FF129462 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:50:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ZhXow7SdaNb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:50:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x234.google.com (mail-vk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19C9B129455 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:50:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id r136so11907399vke.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:50:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ui5zqvSVS2C40TAioNJdAj9nN2Vy3v2s8dwoK8vb8TQ=; b=P5qJ/5aZF6tpP5tt9veSx6pTlV9D1tdRMJkFUkXb64z/ddwmMjkozQwcwVnN2w8YH+ 3aDYnJ2XD6WOlX9Zm46akVuPwydN3CW1aDe9+R0cpDCrxZN5uBrPsItvFzQgmtyYnwzz X9hu92NK/rLHF3n1JI2RAoNGrLtX7jE/FIrOB2+FmEQl07ZRTs+K5DeRbCClg6TYl0Uf jJ6jcLNPBKAbXetRxCo/Wl4tE75SOPyuWC7x81CpCIkPTNviJuZ9JyhsCUIwzMhKc1FY BG6sj7Kw49iLXOGAAHJwRmgOowSBJOBEE9BHVsslaKEJYcuBJS7DsqAmFXpqbAUqxJrc +bLg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ui5zqvSVS2C40TAioNJdAj9nN2Vy3v2s8dwoK8vb8TQ=; b=ijes5zsyKQrRyVMWhiRIM0c5WhAEMSsn1+2vB7wW5daRNZaB3zqrf2SeIEL3y4nkJK NQNd01OdiZA+j5PU08Z4kY6yTw3e6MyfH9gLtrpJM8BHsNCWVwwwrVO/pFLvKyIKqOeR jdL9FiZXUqzXPabyMAd/2d1XzASAAHYRw0f2oUhtLhiTOx5drWWPCg+QaraN26Bv+G5E 1YXvIZWO1V96Y6ma3EXZGYDPBHLlk7j2ZO22XtBOGLwAzBnEuLN3hd2OMCyI2K5kR2xH frniw2u20yUUpbS4twtRHzJbdAOb3uXCTB9NZV3zSKm6X4So1HE5ATbOFgli3L4PxfaJ LokQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mxy8uVgjATjLvqOfcx9WKjxxOpet8ojqtuKMAgPAYgKQuluILdVEEDoxILZYjJE0Ak8BZg8D6eSUPSjFhG
X-Received: by 10.31.150.134 with SMTP id y128mr15585297vkd.102.1487811021010; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:50:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.171.2 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:50:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m2poiaug54.wl-randy@psg.com>
References: <20170221101339.GC84656@Vurt.local> <CAKD1Yr33oQb=gMGaEM++hLgmMtxMdihiDrUihEsjs63vy8qRbA@mail.gmail.com> <54c81141-e4f5-4436-9479-9c02be6c09bb@Spark> <CAKD1Yr28iQHt0iuLvR3ndrT3Hfct=4k9dxjJeu3MAjDjOogEvA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaZgTp++PJ9KGHEWuPoVm6t3b8QfVDCEhz5h4fv-0fuUAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3SbR=xt3RPu7+q1o14wKuUuwUc6oG+BgZtEK1O+m5sWw@mail.gmail.com> <4936e96b-fc82-4de0-9188-ced9547deb2f@Spark> <CAKD1Yr3K+SJb_4ksZ96yNypVKJE-fXopuVaXNhhKp1gkh1=QEg@mail.gmail.com> <20170222144147.GC89584@hanna.meerval.net> <CAKD1Yr2n=ogFo7LJYgjcraoFxioQQzmo8HYxzNRJ10VA8xMVOg@mail.gmail.com> <20170222153129.GE89584@hanna.meerval.net> <m2poiaug54.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:50:00 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr04AKpvp81KdSb9zoMfr0ZdNLq8a+Wgk-3KqSYfP=Qn7g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141d60066e62b054927ff89"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VopCJ7BmDiUxmV6QI47fncJjVfs>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis@ietf.org, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:50:23 -0000

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:25 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> face it job.  what we have here is non-ops telling us what we should do
> and denying what we actually do and intend to keep doing.  welcome to
> the ietf; we want ops here but that does not mean we want to listen to
> them.
>

Host developers could just as well claim "this is just network ops telling
us what we should do do and denying what we actually do and intend to keep
on doing".

With the difference that the standards clearly specify what the current
state of affairs is.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email