IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Fri, 26 December 2014 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04141A8F45 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:48:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d5V3d6Y5LPY7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:48:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8CE81A8F44 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:48:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-8-156.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sBQGmSB7005568 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:48:31 -0800
Message-ID: <549D9148.2070101@bbiw.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:48:08 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
References: <ED473823-2B1E-4431-8B42-393D20BA72DF@piuha.net> <549D8C57.8090402@nostrum.com> <3971A4A6-F4A6-4BAA-9DAF-974EE674DD89@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <3971A4A6-F4A6-4BAA-9DAF-974EE674DD89@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.67]); Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:48:31 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VpKbzsXePvcbAC_Lce1RzK4Z9bY
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:48:32 -0000

On 12/26/2014 8:41 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> We could choose a different name.   How about Transport, Applications and Realtime (TAR)?


Probably ought to rank the sequence by the amount of activity in each.
That's probably realtime, application, transport...

More generally, I'm impressed to find out that transport and apps have
so much in common, given how little interaction the two areas have had
over the years, in spite of explicit efforts.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email