Re: Making the Tao a web page

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Mon, 04 June 2012 09:45 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268AD21F86E8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 02:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.482
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zQfufxhxdlCu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 02:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CB821F8603 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 02:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcqp1 with SMTP id p1so2651417vcq.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 02:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RhCzhFJW0ndfyut3rOeYJLm01ShyNICYTM2D5BA6eYg=; b=0G9n91r1VRMyMS+vnwiYjf2+PVcxKsniLXgMm2/rZP3CQizQXi7witMUqgZRcIPzS1 81yMx6Yz8+4eWCHmYJL1ibaBul8pNNIzGooubKMIEL6kB2bYtRIyfKb8dqTKKnWO8VZ5 UKb4nM17nyu4ntFeaY5DefJfVQmnWix8EXDJ202n0XTkHjFuOFcIhrQj3aX/o7HF6v53 HLZTv+oaQC60kohi3W9j1I1VtII0uZl/Xj+um0yKnCxSpxiqiDhHzw1rbGW+wSfLm3Ao hFo9CfZBIJ9RWSuGuTGekwTihw+wwcWgyuzbKL//hNE6X/1rdMK9RgvPUxEheh67qSA8 F5+A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.65.145 with SMTP id x17mr9900759vds.117.1338803116133; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 02:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.98.77 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 02:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 11:45:16 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-GiVPK2i00zYEdHtnkoD+AmX7CRx0gwxbWcyggH4GU2g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Making the Tao a web page
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: lixia@cs.ucla.edu, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:23:35 -0700
Cc: john-ietf@jck.com, sm@resistor.net
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 09:45:17 -0000

Hi

I agree with you, and would add we need the web and RFC so that we get
things right. However, to make quick progress in RFC is not to wait
for discussions to end, but to open a restricted period/window for
discussion which MUST end some date and make the changes/updates, then
take the final consensus,

Best regards
AB

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
On Jun 3, 2012, at 6:34 PM, John C Klensin wrote:

> ... I further guess that
> "on an ongoing basis" will be better for the document than
> getting a new snapshot out as an RFC and seeing how long it
> takes to get stale and how long after that it takes the
> community to notice. ...

I second the above statement
(my apology to John for quoting this single sentence out of his whole msg)

Lixia