IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 19 April 2021 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E35F3A2704 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.049
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=yax1NLRO; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=TatNYIIs
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gEzC7S6LebTm for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F5D03A270C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 56943 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2021 21:09:49 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=de6b.607df19d.k2104; bh=8PPzhuBIQmU3Wp9waxw7klWRwia0FNnfTVbYl4q8xPU=; b=yax1NLRO2ee8LIKWKo1UFsG4EiXWPnimEhTMFLns4cdAN95e95tojMT35mJiyxUXTXwrRgVC3O6mcBD3e49BscY8BMiKHCd3FSwR4gN1Xzw44jayVhg8Ku0mg7aQ6QBXI0eeK4FuK/6Mgc+02Jg2w0D7n6OW8hz/jk1efOBPuAmaEV+apz1SBxk8CT89mNFBxvzgO0PC4RijhfOsmgl5go4if0kqhyjygAUEdG1INQ5Aqd2ZaUQHWJqfuGxsBMzCdgzb/4lNGclxvjHTwPrZaNToON0RaQ46lx+39WhQBrq6bMRlT+wrmJl1bi8yNW/a8/who8XaDMEsiVyT81rIyw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=de6b.607df19d.k2104; bh=8PPzhuBIQmU3Wp9waxw7klWRwia0FNnfTVbYl4q8xPU=; b=TatNYIIsEe/zifNr2eTwhcJQOkPdVBfFkxR3Dh0JbWbcf8aM2SwhcrH/DwWJMDoM2qLIU9zbIKm2i7M6Tvu/5S8iGGBMdRsYgeGBuo4nAZ0vea7lt73oEDjBd2lck8GqqrySak/GpGJahnyu4+CL4v9h4bi5VwXHk34zUEIceibu6g061FAN5mmdswRJ2lkTTBM6e1maVDmXmikobGeYbtDDejPuQrRTZgp/AxDy6YLUtHl6nkJuMfktP0jpLpOcl/pnqBN6muRozsfGnEhMYEl4pl2Fqv7p0gxVifwqpRO0bAY/Cdec1DShgr52nsyR9utgz2Zv83/ZpiuVL4xeSQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 19 Apr 2021 21:09:48 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id E64EA73AC0AC; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:09:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:09:47 -0400
Message-Id: <20210419210947.E64EA73AC0AC@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: phill@hallambaker.com
Subject: Re: Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwj5NDX9LAHfZJXtjqModa4R4WOFQVA5xsscY99J1v9Z2g@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Vy-TzmPqr5GIlTo79xnC9QJh26c>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:10:00 -0000

It appears that Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> said:
>So instead of the Internet core routers knowing the IPaddress->ASN tables,
>they are given the ASN number and an opaque blob.
>
>This approach would require packets to be converted from network format
>(IPv6) to IPvX format at the network gateway and back again. And of course,
>packets would have to carry information that allows the IPv6
>source/destination to be recovered at the other end.

It sounds like every network gateway needs the equivalent of a full
set of routing tables to map address->ASN.  Am I missing something
or is that going to have a few scaling problems?

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email