Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 31 January 2017 07:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD221293FF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 23:48:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10gKjRqZAjB0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 23:48:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E64120726 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 23:48:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9333B2D299; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:48:28 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kfXNh8XaU2Ib; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:48:28 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4D92CC9B; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:48:28 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0FEFE15C-B7DC-4D8F-A348-9F6303FFE1B5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <8dc87024-0b82-f61e-d9f8-233d68516db7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:48:42 +0200
Message-Id: <467F76E5-8C58-48FC-AFDE-C8ED1CE668EA@piuha.net>
References: <CAAUuzMQwk5v+3HA+KFrsCZfbNSXFpgBE0XdKfJWHgDss9-VkTw@mail.gmail.com> <20170130183846.21994.qmail@server322.com> <AB7E9EDD-C313-4821-8BEC-D0AF57D80DA2@nohats.ca> <2D08A4C9-969C-4EFD-8782-84728C458EA3@piuha.net> <A3CBB0CB-4F71-4C10-8F13-3BDBFCFF5314@piuha.net> <8dc87024-0b82-f61e-d9f8-233d68516db7@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VyYU1EC3VqYGv_3X7IBYL5hK8fE>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:48:32 -0000

Thanks, Brian.

And I agree re: ISOC’s role. And:

> Meanwhile, dust off your copies of RFC 1984, 2804 and 7258. I think
> we'll be needing them before long.

My focus from now on.

Jari