Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD221293FF for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 23:48:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10gKjRqZAjB0 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 23:48:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E64120726 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 23:48:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9333B2D299; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:48:28 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kfXNh8XaU2Ib; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:48:28 +0200 (EET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4D92CC9B; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:48:28 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net) Subject: Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0FEFE15C-B7DC-4D8F-A348-9F6303FFE1B5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail From: Jari Arkko In-Reply-To: <8dc87024-0b82-f61e-d9f8-233d68516db7@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:48:42 +0200 Message-Id: <467F76E5-8C58-48FC-AFDE-C8ED1CE668EA@piuha.net> References: <20170130183846.21994.qmail@server322.com> <2D08A4C9-969C-4EFD-8782-84728C458EA3@piuha.net> <8dc87024-0b82-f61e-d9f8-233d68516db7@gmail.com> To: Brian E Carpenter X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Archived-At: Cc: IETF X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF-Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:48:32 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_0FEFE15C-B7DC-4D8F-A348-9F6303FFE1B5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Thanks, Brian. And I agree re: ISOC=92s role. And: > Meanwhile, dust off your copies of RFC 1984, 2804 and 7258. I think > we'll be needing them before long. My focus from now on. Jari --Apple-Mail=_0FEFE15C-B7DC-4D8F-A348-9F6303FFE1B5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYkEFaAAoJEM80gCTQU46qYecQAL/jaXSAdHVdNfLB8mwkrfBU G8MI1gu9IdQ2hPpUzHWtMy8Y9whW7vSNlKkhc25PZJN5to6H9hFrXdhGsavSGhZ+ kMDrUbHybtA35Op1v2Q9txURUINLu3Sz8Vp+01iDNdSatmeqSkomPlGMNnDQKLto Lt3Ay/tknmeH9fgqNEwwneyudz/ax6SPFDIoriAO/rt41rRHk7CsQpQGcqxjDW+R CvXkkbZWfPEE+83zBZW8rtHO8uCQZ1+byQv90Jsx+zz7dKOXssfQipiFZJrzB6az NQ495tkxQfiaNiSvmT89tML7s+cpkgOKbPxZX9Z71+rdBEu1xQ1DED+ct5chX3iV D7symKgbiGpZGITtMbXXV8/VMoCm4xU2X5xr0hTaJEtE6rBTImoiA4b16YhP2OIS 64pCs3R/tlNeVP98LguyjpXryn5yFyH+NKOjXfXuqnC3fpcTcvGZF1f6omVGwCkm c0X0B1nVxEGm8pFakxJ3VVERTXyuICoM4mrhlWG0WgFCzSAcq/iJzyHFL7bm4orl PA4jCDf4oStdB9wJ5+U5Hbdo8ZjdCWVRpgyI1LvtWqV04Yxt+tSJjEl2dIbUm1Ji wx2A1yK/w/I2takQhyXhJV+zkIyoTAm8IPL0AlDu2boHAvh7+4mi+CaY6MVXeSV9 35JK3YUlJHGL/N736Tvc =aQ+S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_0FEFE15C-B7DC-4D8F-A348-9F6303FFE1B5--