Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here)

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sun, 02 December 2012 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA48A21F847B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 10:48:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N+JVl4OKWFDE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 10:48:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1F321F841A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 10:48:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from joels-MacBook-Air.local (c-98-207-206-4.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.207.206.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB2ImbqF008407 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 2 Dec 2012 18:48:38 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <50BBA21D.6090403@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 10:46:53 -0800
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Subject: Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here)
References: <CAC4RtVCogYS4tmY1LLi0C-E+B+di2_wTD0N-=AZrVR7-A8Mz+A@mail.gmail.com> <50B5C839.4060909@gmail.com> <59924CD37D50616BA8EB8EF7@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121128023905.0afdcde0@resistor.net> <50B683C4.2030503@stpeter.im> <50B68612.7080107@dcrocker.net> <50B693ED.7000609@stpeter.im> <50B696B0.30904@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAC4RtVAG+pKSQMwPyB6GJ7jxJM4hNpU81Yt8he6ZsEMrg_rTbQ@mail.gmail.com> <00c001cdce7a$d9fa6490$8def2db0$@asgard.org> <50B7EA5D.2030803@qti.qualcomm.com> <50BA18B8.3090306@network-heretics.com> <p06240609cce032de76ff@dhcp184-48-45-14.hroa.orl.wayport.net> <m2obidvuv7.wl%randy@psg.com> <p0624060ccce0b42ffc47@dhcp184-48-45-14.hroa.orl.wayport.net> <50BB10FF.6090105@gmail.com> <50BB5A69.40107@network-heretics.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121202073741.0ac80c68@resistor.net> <A1D3CE1A0AA345FE0ECB6697@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <50BB92FB.5040904@dcrocker.net> <50BB950A.9000408@network-heretics.com> <50BB9699.6070404@dcrocker.net> <50BB9888.8080906@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <50BB9888.8080906@network-heretics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:48:38 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:48:40 -0000

On 12/2/12 10:06 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
> On 12/02/2012 12:57 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/2/2012 9:51 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
>>> I think you're missing the point.   The core problem is the overuse of
>>> presentations, and presentation tools, for working group face to face
>>> meeting time which is better suited for discussion.
>>
>>
>> stop blaming the tool.  focus on the folks doing the speaking.
> The tool is a big part of the problem.  The tool encourages a certain 
> style of interaction that is generally inappropriate for face to face 
> working group meetings.
>

We have non-native english speakers and remote participants both working 
at a disadvantage to follow the discussion in the room. We should make 
it harder for them by removing the pretext that the discussion is 
structured around material that they can review and follow along on? I 
don't think that's even remotely helpful.

> Of course, strictly speaking, the focus is on the people who are using 
> the tool, and more broadly, on using the habit and community 
> expectation that keeps encouraging people to use a poorly suited 
> tool.  But they're using the tool poorly precisely because it's very 
> difficult to use that tool well for that purpose.   A different 
> toolset, (e.g. pens and paper and overhead cameras coupled to 
> projectors), would likely produce better results if that toolset did 
> not encourage laziness in preparing materials to facilitate discussion.

> Keith
>