IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Thu, 13 November 2008 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689AD3A69CA; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:01:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090173A69C6 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:01:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.333, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8tNzYDYsKxQZ for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:01:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-6.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-6.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 076CA3A69BA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:01:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:44610) by ppsw-6.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1L0gVY-0002dN-Jy (Exim 4.70) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:01:32 +0000
Received: from fanf2 (helo=localhost) by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local-esmtp id 1L0gVY-0007TQ-5i (Exim 4.67) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:01:32 +0000
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:01:32 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Subject: Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
In-Reply-To: <F5C5FABB17439793E3053271@p3.int.jck.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0811131759010.14367@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0811121942450.12067-100000@egate.xpasc.com> <20081113112302.38928.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <e0c581530811130740g1db5cbfehbcdad361660bf48b@mail.gmail.com> <491C5339.8090801@dcrocker.net> <F5C5FABB17439793E3053271@p3.int.jck.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, John C Klensin wrote:
>
> If there were a BCP on the table that would permit us to talk
> about DNSRBLs that conform and those that don't, rather than
> about subjective opinions of "behaving badly", we would, IMO, be
> having a rather different discussion.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-04.txt

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
ROCKALL MALIN HEBRIDES: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7, INCREASING 7 OR GALE 8, PERHAPS
SEVERE GALE 9 LATER. ROUGH OR VERY ROUGH. RAIN, FOG PATCHES. MODERATE OR GOOD,
OCCASIONALLY VERY POOR.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email