Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Fri, 26 February 2021 04:30 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7209E3A0AB8; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:30:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ufWOqHXCvtut; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:30:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 511FF3A0ACB; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:30:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2800:810:464:2b9:a449:5f08:346f:44bd] (unknown [IPv6:2800:810:464:2b9:a449:5f08:346f:44bd]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9261280615; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 04:30:17 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <37eecb9b-f0eb-e21c-b162-b1f0339e4981@si6networks.com> <446A8D6B-E624-49E0-B67E-D1F8AFC794E2@lastpresslabel.com> <28ac1e86-f641-b9e8-0f61-6ff442feaa90@si6networks.com> <LO2P265MB057322BA95B1B44D4175356BC29E9@LO2P265MB0573.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <b24ce0e9-8912-12b1-af8a-6024ae83288f@si6networks.com> <25E1B1D5-E8F1-4053-A1E0-6B2948577E84@akamai.com> <3a8dca6d-0aca-d578-0f7a-3f68e2811bad@si6networks.com> <9FBF7792-8507-45F2-B06C-2173BCDF7D4C@akamai.com> <4fc62af0-cbf0-c923-5e24-fc0dfc1de996@si6networks.com> <B8DDE7D2-0105-45D5-93FB-34FF8561D888@akamai.com> <d5854cb1-ff93-6284-5106-93dd8a06f6f1@si6networks.com> <F758F440-55ED-44DE-A613-C19C3BE14160@akamai.com> <CABcZeBMutHGPKyAS+Apq-zAUjXRcpfEvAGPDuB6oejGkfkEtCw@mail.gmail.com> <b478aa64-43cd-e0f7-1913-974f7c8a191b@si6networks.com> <8B649927-DC39-4E59-95F9-A83C3CD8F494@akamai.com> <3c5b4c2a-e770-6809-5649-76adf15c67ba@si6networks.com> <7E0F4F4E-8BD2-4D1A-B998-2F4B09DA1DF4@akamai.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <939c6505-e2c5-6bfb-ab5c-ec6274738338@si6networks.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:29:56 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7E0F4F4E-8BD2-4D1A-B998-2F4B09DA1DF4@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/W4fg7XGeBd1H5OTg0VZk6mBvZZE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 04:30:57 -0000

Hi, Rich,

On 25/2/21 20:49, Salz, Rich wrote:
>> When you're changing the way of contributing, you're not
>> universally
> "reducing the barrier". -- certainly not for somebody that does't do
> git.
> 
> The IETF has not changed the way people contribute.  Drafts are still
> posted to the datatracker, mailing lists still exist for feedback and
> comment (and must be used for confirming consensus, etc).  Just
> because there are more paths into the datatracker now.  I mean,
> probably around 1985-1995 we all just FTP'd the documents we wanted
> to read.  Is anyone going to argue that it's not easier now?

Based on some comments it seems that in some cases a significant 
fraction of the discussion moved to github. Hence my question.
In such a case, participants are kind of required to participate in github.

I didn't participate much (if at all) in the recommendations regarding 
the use of github in the ietf. And my assumtion was that for the most 
part it was more of a "use it if deemed useful", but was assuming the 
discussions that would lead to changes to remain in the mailing-lists.


> 
>> Point taken. So... mailing list are seen as a problematic mechanism
>> to
> carry our work?
> 
> For some people I think the answer is yes.  It seems that overall use
> of email is declining, but it's hard to get real numbers without
> getting tangled up in email marketing newsletter business.  But I
> feel like you keep trying to have me make blanket assertions and I
> don't want to do that.

No, no. It was a honest question. Me I wasn't aware about some of the 
assumptions that were mentioned in the thread... hence my questions.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492