IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Historic

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 20 November 2013 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30FE1AE12B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:09:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XQiFY_qM7IuU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:09:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og108.obsmtp.com (exprod7og108.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8705B1AE146 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:09:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob108.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUo0IzEUT3+CrdvN2aDyW+l1cnBP4sIyp@postini.com; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:09:00 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239A21B82C6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:09:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BF06190043; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:09:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from vpna-132.vpn.nominum.com (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:08:59 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Historic
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <528CF649.5000209@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:08:56 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <B5317E33-E56D-4174-8A3C-AA781BEB5270@nominum.com>
References: <20131002145238.78084.qmail@joyce.lan> <524D846A.6030905@tana.it> <CAC4RtVBb9FVtmjK4X5hCQpMorHnjmyJLU1sYbNh==iBh8SqztQ@mail.gmail.com> <528CF075.9000204@dcrocker.net> <528CF4FB.2060505@isode.com> <528CF649.5000209@dcrocker.net>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:09:07 -0000

On Nov 20, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> Why isn't the IETF mailing list archive discussion about the status change sufficient as an archival record?

Because it's hard to find this information in the IETF mailing list archive, and it's often not summarized (although in this case Barry's explanation of his consensus call might be sufficient).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email